fusion

Have Chatterboxes and they work pretty decent.

sounds like it was shoved over.

I appreciate the support

Yeah the story was verified by her camp yesterday afternoon I think it was. The second she answered the phone "This is Sarah" when talking to the leader of another country I cringed. It's just down hill from there.

Here's a link to the transcript with vid. Originally found the audio elsewhere but I'm posting the Kos link because it has both the audio on and transcript on the same page. http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/11/1/163922/235/763/649110

If you don't know who you're voting for you should really just mind your own damn business and not bother posting in this thread.

STFU n00b! There...feel free to cast your vote.

was surprised also

Can I vote for myself?

My son has a Fulmer offroad helmet and it's been great. Made well and durable.

I play on Pokerstars occasionally.

I think shooting the penguin had me rolling the hardest. Disappointed in the lack of polar bears though.

I love these threads sometimes.

One of the problems with this is we are discussing something about a third party that has both statements and voting records that sends mixed messages depending on how you interpret them. Makes this a bit difficult. But it does limit it's practice if something like that is at the religions core. No it isn't. It's literally a limit on speech. It is illegal to do those things. That's almost like arguing against other rights and freedoms. I can enslave or murder someone and I may be prosecuted for it. You can play those games with every law on the books. When are you getting your nukes?

Fair enough except he said,"I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right" In other words he disagrees with the DC ban, but that doesn't mean there can't be restrictions. Only if you ignore where I said,"... unless it violates laws...". You can't have multiple wives even if it is part of your religion, it's illegal and doesn't infringe on anyones rights if you could. That is still a law restricting your freedom of speech. You can't libel or slander as an example. The law tells you that you can't do those things spoken or written. You're right.. I actually thought about that after I hit submit. I was meaning rights when I wrote freedoms in some instances. Just typing in a hurry in between working.

I'll try to explain this without getting into a debate over the 2nd amendment... You have th right to bear arms, but not in any private owned establishment if they don't want you to. That is supported by laws passed by the state. You have freedom of religion, unless it violates laws (bigomy, sacrifice, age restrictions...) or infringes on another's right. You have freedom of speech, but you can't get in my face to say what you want. Could be considered harassement, threatening speech, blah blah, blah... Every freedom has restrictions...

Actually the quote is: "I believe that the Constitution confers an individual right to bear arms. But just because you have an individual right does not mean that the state or local government can't constrain the exercise of that right," ---Obama And technically he's correct. There's a reason the McCain camp doesn't make this a huge issue, they know it's correct also.

Something has to be said when Warren Buffet supports Obama and McCain has even said in debate that he is one of those people he has great respect for when it comes to economics. He would be BOTH their choices as Treasury Secretary if he would take the job.

love that one.

that was more fun than expected.

I don't know. While I personally think one choice, only counting McCain and Obama, is the lesser of 2 evils, taking into account that they are both not great choices can have some sitting the fence.

Going early Tuesday with the other half.

fire