No see, that's the thing with unemployment... 1) A lot of the people collecting it are hypocrites. They'll say they don't want to collect payment from the gubmint - they'll tell you they're 'better than that' to mooch off the gov't, and drone on and on about the 'welfare scum' that collects it - though they aren't part of 'that group' (oh no), everyone else is. But, they're also too good for a minimum wage job, or a drastic pay cut from where they used to be. 2) Economically, there's a perverse incentive to STAY on unemployment since your unemployment check is based on your past wages (last 1-2 years, I think?)... you take a minimum wage job, you lose unemployment, which not only is probably less net money, but it'll affect any future unemployment by driving your average wage down per the unemployment formula. So, it's a lose-lose. The only way I can figure that this isn't a perverse incentive is that the government doesn't want people being underemployed because in the grand scheme, that's just as bad. It will drive the people that don't have the skills for a higher-paying jobs out of work, and those people are probably the most likely to need the structure in their lives - I dunno, I'm not a psychologist. I could do more research if I cared or someone wants to debate it with me. Regardless of derailing the thread, I'd apologize, but Dave is getting free bumpage from it... so, I'm not really that sorry.