Jump to content

Disclaimer

Members
  • Posts

    15,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Disclaimer

  1. Please fill this form out since I have obviously hurt your liberal feelings so frequently!

    :lol: says the guy who threatens to put me on ignore because he can't find a pair of 'big boy' pants to have an adult discussion and has to leave negative rep because that's his only way to fight back. Ohh, and it only took you 4 days to come back and google that image. You're still dwelling on it son. :lol:

    Your irony never ceases to amuse.

    • Downvote 1
  2. If you sit there with your turn signal on and it';s safe for you to change lanes but your don't change lanes, then I'd make the argument case that you were stopped or moving unreasonably slowly. The law doesn't make any distinction between movement within a lane or movement between lanes. Any time you fail to proceed even though it is safe, you are impeding traffic.

    Who determines what is safe?

    Me, as the operator of my motor vehicle?

    You, as an observer of the operation of my motor vehicle?

    The law, as judged by someone appointed with said authority?

    Or an objective definition as written into law?

    (ie. "It is considered safe when... you are moving at less than 5mph relative to those vehicles with which you are merging and have enough distance between your vehicle and the opposite vehicles so as to have 20ft in the front and rear of your vehicle once merging has commenced")

  3. http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511.33

    If you are in backup in the left lane, and you see a vehicle driving down the empty right lane, and you cross half into the right lane to stop them, then there are a few problems with that.

    I get that one, pretty cut-and-dry, you can't merge or change lanes into someone.

    Your second part however, is a little more subjective.

    There's also http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511.22
    (A) No person shall stop or operate a vehicle, trackless trolley, or street car at such an unreasonably slow speed as to impede or block the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, except when stopping or reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or to comply with law.

    Given the "normal and reasonable movement of traffic" at that particular moment in time is slow/standstill, one could argue that they were in compliance, especially if they had signaled to merge back into the left lane.

    Secondly, "stopping or reduced speed is necessary for safe operation or to comply with law", one could argue they felt their recourse for safe operation was to come to a complete stop in order to safely merge in the left lane.

    I don't know offhand what laws are applicable to construction zone signage and what legal weight a "Right lane closed, merge left" orange sign has, but if I were to feel like I wanted to play 'traffic cop du jour', I should have legal merit to sit in the right lane with the intent to merge left (ie. sit there in the right lane with my left turn signal on) in order to comply with the signage. No?

    Whether I actual merge or not is my choice, but in the eyes of the law, safety and complicity are the key words and I could debate I was acting in accordance with both. Especially the safety verbiage. Unless there's some case law to refute the subjectivity of safe operation of a motor vehicle?

  4. $400 to H&R block? DAMN! Hell I don't do my taxes, but I will subcontract out yours for $250. Hell I will pocket the other $150. We pay just a touch over $100 to have ours done and ours is itemized and more complicated. I think you are a moron. The $400 you give to H&R could buy you some gear!

    Hell why not throw $400 down the toilet and flush? And loan the government $10k a year LOL! You are dumber than a box of rocks!!!

    ^---- Take it from this guy. His taxes are complicated, they require some addition and subtraction.

    • Downvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...