Gump

I didn't like it, long staights.

lol...the lady asked if we wanted her to slow down the Ferry to enjoy the river. F*ck you, I said no. lol

O come on now. You know you want to ride the ferry

Basically 332 south out of Carrollton to 164, 164 sucks due to road condition, to 115, to 151, to 250, to 800 south, last half of 800 rocks! but be careful there are no curve signs, turn left on 7 and there is a gas station and restaurant, then take the Fly Ferry across the river, $3 per bike, then 2 towards Marietta, which is boring and straight, then 807 across the river, then left on 7, sucks, straight and congested, to Marietta, then right on 60 north, boring and straight, to 83, which is always fun up till you get past 70, then to 93, then to 751 which is fun and ends at 77, then left onto Stone creek road which is a blast. 39 back to Carrollton. Slightly under 300 miles. http://g.co/maps/p39eh

Wth...must be his retirement plan to have 9 kids take care of him.

MArlboroman and I we'll be doing that second route backwords sunday leaving from Carrollton at 10. Not running above New phily though. Probably pass you all in a blur.

What time do you think you'd be in new phily? I could meet up then ditch in wooster.

It's like buying a Zebco fishing reel. It's cheap and it should work but I don't expect it to last very long.

lol...ya, you kinda get mezmorized

Yes. And it's working now. Wierd.

On my phone it's 5' wide. I use to just double click a empty space and it made the titles of the threads readable. Now it actually shrinks them and they are really really wide, so wide and tiny I can't read them?

Not sure either but I think it just needs to be 50 years old or older. To be recognized as C&R items, 478.11 specifies that firearms must fall within one of the following categories: Firearms which were manufactured at least 50 years prior to the current date, but not including replicas of such firearms; Firearms which are certified by the curator of a municipal, State, or Federal museum which exhibits firearms to be curios or relics of museum interest; and Any other firearms which derive a substantial part of their monetary value from the fact that they are novel, rare, bizarre, or because of their association with some historical figure, period, or event.

Didn't we pay for them a while ago? It's free money. I'd take them, if not it's wasted money. They would fall under curios and relics, I believe. For a few bucks and a license you could have them mailed to you.

What's "Valley"?

That's why I asked if anyone new if it was fake or not. I removed a few solicitations to boot, so it would fit. And, I've never heard of them.

This is just the latest in a series of anti-gun schemes from the Obama Administration: *** A new so-called “Assaults Weapon Ban" -- targeting ALL semi-automatic rifles and shotguns -- which, unlike the Clinton ban, would NEVER expire; *** An outright BAN on “high capacity” magazines -- banning the sale and manufacture of magazines holding more than just a handful of rounds; *** A National Concealed Carry “Standard” -- designed to make it even more difficult for law-abiding citizens to carry a gun to protect themselves and their families from assault; *** Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s “Catch-All Gun Control Scheme” -- to create a national “cannot buy registry,” allowing citizens to be stripped of their Second Amendment rights on a Justice Department whim, effectively banning all private gun sales. That’s why it is essential that Americans like you and I take a stand against the M1 Carbine and 1911 gun ban! It has been common practice since the end of World War II to re-import these American made rifles from the foreign allies they were lent to during the war. But the Obama Administration departs radically from the American tradition. In fact, on top of banning American citizens from owning these historic firearms, Obama’s State Department is arranging for the destruction of nearly one million of them -- ironically, at a time of ballooning federal deficits. It’s an outrage! These firearms -- truly pieces of American history -- rightly belong in the hands of U.S. citizens. That’s why I was glad to hear that the National Association for Gun Rights is helping fight this power grab in the U.S. Senate. Do you believe the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the Second Amendment are the supreme law of the land? Do you believe that President Obama banning the re-importation of these historic firearms is an unprecedented and unconstitutional power grab? Do you support Congress forcing President Obama to reverse his ban and save these American made firearms from destruction? If you said “Yes” to these questions, please sign the Firearms Freedom Survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you. Your survey will put you squarely on the record AGAINST Barack Obama’s Gun Ban. And along with your signed survey, I hope you’ll send a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35 to help finance this battle. With your generous contribution, the National Association for Gun Rights will continue contacting Second Amendment supporters to turn up the heat on targeted U.S. Senators. Not only that, but they’re preparing a massive program to launch the designed to force President Obama to reverse this ban. Direct mail. Phones. E-mail. Blogs. Guest editorials. Press conferences. Hard-hitting internet, newspaper, radio and even TV ads if funding permits. The whole nine yards. Of course, a program of this scale is only possible if the National Association for Gun Rights can raise the money. But that’s not easy. So please put yourself on record AGAINST Barack Obama’s Rifle Ban by signing NAGR’s Firearms Freedom Survey. But along with your survey, please agree to make a generous contribution of $250, $100, $50 or even just $35. And every dollar counts in this fight so even if you can only chip in $10 or $20, your help will still make a difference. Thank you in advance for your time and money devoted to defending our Second Amendment rights. For Freedom, Rand Paul United States Senator P.S. In a move unprecedented in American history, Barack Obama secretly banned the re-importation of nearly a million American made M1 Carbine rifles and 1911 pistols. The M1 rifle, developed in the 1930’s, carried the U.S. through World War II seeing action in every major battle. So please put yourself on record AGAINST the Barack Obama’s Rifle Gun by signing NAGR’s Firearms Freedom Survey.

Is this a legit thing, old, and/ or just money grubbing malarchy...? Dear fellow Patriot, Nearly 1 million American firearms. Banned by a stroke of Barack Obama’s pen. In a move unprecedented in American history, the Obama Administration quietly banned the re-importation of nearly 600,000 American made M1 Carbine rifles. And I've just discovered Obama may be blocking as many 300,000 1911 Colts too! That's nearly one million pieces of American history denied to the American people. The M1 rifle, developed in the late 1930’s, carried the United States through World War II seeing action in every major battle. General Patton at the time called the M1 “the greatest battle implement ever devised.” The rifle is largely credited with giving American soldiers the advantage and securing victory for the allies. During the Korean War, nearly one million of these rifles were brought to South Korea and left with the South Korean government afterward. Now, South Korea wants to give American gun collectors the chance to get their hands on this unique piece of history. A piece of American history that Barack Obama would like to see go down the memory hole. That’s why I want as many Americans as possible to put themselves on record opposing this gun ban by signing the Official Firearms Freedom Survey the National Association for Gun Rights has prepared for you. Will you please join me? After World War II, the United States government sent millions of these rifles overseas to our allies and friends. That includes 950,000 M1 Garands, 1.2 million M1 Carbines, and 300,000 1911 Pistols. Over the past 50 years, many of the countries we lent them to returned them to America to be bought and sold by firearms collectors. This is nothing new. Make no mistake; these firearms were made in America, by Americans, for Americans, to defend freedom on foreign shores. As a part of our history, they are greatly sought after by American shooters and collectors. But according to Hillary Clinton’s State Department there is a danger they might “fall into the wrong hands.” That they might, possibly, one day be used in a crime. No mention of the hundreds of thousands of gun owners deprived of the opportunity to own an integral part of American history. The State Department’s outrageous claims are nothing more than a thinly veiled ploy to distract from the real issue: President Obama’s deep seated hatred for gun rights. While his gun-grabbing base is giddy with praise at this back-door gun ban, law-abiding citizens across the United States are crying foul. Let me be clear: at no time in U.S. history has the ownership of this of these firearms -- or any part of these firearms -- been illegal, restricted or banned. Americans have collected World War II M1 rifles for decades. Now they are sold through the Civilian Marksmanship Program. You can even purchase a newly manufactured model from Springfield Armory that was made just a month or two ago. And the M1’s caliber or capacity is no more dangerous than the millions of modern firearms owned by Americans across the country today. As you can see, there is absolutely no justification for this unconstitutional gun ban.

I might be up for this. Depends on how the night fishing goes. What's your route though it's sounds like city riding?

That minority stuff is for the birds. I see it in business all the time. Gubment funded facilities must use a minority supplier for this or that....or, not must, but it benefits them to use a minority supplier/contractor in some manner so it's make the choice easy for them.

I thought it looked sad.... The stones nice. Love me some brick.

U get no benefits from the gubment for riding? My vote would be to remove all benefits from marriage. Their should also be no law within marriage tying eachother to one another financially in any way. What's yours is yours and what's mine is mine unless given to you. No difference,single or married. It's not like we have a population problem to begin with.

Weak. So to get equal benefits I have to be like someone else, do what someone else does. Maybe marriage benefits were designed to help people raise families originally.

Ok , wierd, but what if I'm not socially acceptable to anyone to be able to marry? I'm not getting the benefits dammit.

Ya...wait a minute... Why can't I marry my brother, sister, mom or dad! My rights are being trampled on dammit!

What rights?