Gergwheel1647545492 Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 OK so rl, myself, and 2 of our friends were sitting around watching tv and rl said that some lady had a nice set of DSL. the whole dispute is weather it is DSL, or DSLs. I believe it is DSLs and rl says it is DSL. please let me know your input so i can hopefully put him to shame. edited out apostrophes [ 30. March 2005, 06:58 AM: Message edited by: gergwheel ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crash1647545504 Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 graemlins/wtf.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin R. Posted March 29, 2005 Report Share Posted March 29, 2005 Well if you wanna get into grammar, DSL with an apostrophe S would be entitling ownership to the DSL. So you would then have to say "The DSL'S fur coat attacked me." or such. So, if anything, I would go with DSL, although my friends and I would say DSLs. But there would be no apostrophe. Not sure if the apostrophe was in the argument, but it plays a big role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rl Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Greg has the mental capacity of a 5 year old. It really makes me sad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest doggunracing Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Does it stand for Dead Sexy Legs? If so, you are defining it as a set of legs, since no one would talk about the individual legs. So you would say DSL. The only way you would make it plural is if you were talking about multiple sets of legs, such as a group of women. Then you would say, "Those are some nice DSLs". You only use an apostrophe to make numbers, characters or abbreviations with periods, plural. For example, 9's, &'s, and Ph.D.'s. You also should use an apostrophe if the 's' could confuse the meaning, or if the abbreviation ends with a lowercase letter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRE Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 no DSLs stands for Dick Sucking Lips. and i say she has DSLs just because it sounds better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gergwheel1647545492 Posted March 30, 2005 Author Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 ok i screwed up and put in the apostrophe. APARENTLY what i meant was DSLs. and rob so far it looks like its 2 for DSLs and 1 for DSL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GSRchick714 Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 WHO CARES?! Just agree on the fact that she had them hahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
telsea Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 lol..i think its DSL.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Originally posted by rl: Greg has the mental capacity of a 5 year old. It really makes me sad if you think that makes you sad, you should see the cougar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurboII7 Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Wow I can't beleive you guys are debating this, I would say DSLs just cuz it sounds better to me. Though DSL would make sense too, but really who cares. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 They are refered to as DSLs. DSL would be dick sucking lip. Hopefully she has 2 of them, unless you are a sick bastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martindc1 Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Definitely DSLs. If one lip was a good DSL and the other one was not, then you would say "wow look at that DSL." But since I assume both lips were DSLs then you would say DSLs. You don't say "Where's my shoe?" unless you are only looking for one shoe. "Wow look at those shoes" is better than "Wow look at those shoe." "Wow look at those DSLs", "Wow look at THAT DSL." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rl Posted March 30, 2005 Report Share Posted March 30, 2005 Originally posted by Tenzig: if you think that makes you sad, you should see the cougar. The only way to learn is to do something wrong once. Apparently you are learning, since you managed to make 30 less rwhp then me in the same car on the same dyno 4 years later Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted March 31, 2005 Report Share Posted March 31, 2005 Originally posted by rl: The only way to learn is to do something wrong once. Apparently you are learning, since you managed to make 30 less rwhp then me in the same car on the same dyno 4 years later I blame the AOD and its baked fluid, along with the fat ass 11.8:1 AFR. All I've actualy done to the car is change the oil once ( year and a half ago), gut it, and run the piss out of it for a day. I did do something that you never managed to do...I made it competitive somewhere. 1:45 on MidOhios Pro course, That's Z06 territory with 230 rwhp, a 3 speed slipping auto, and open 3:27s buring the inside wheel out of every corner. Gimme a good T5, I'll add my 3:73 track lock and it will shave 5 seconds off that, easily. graemlins/thumb.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.