copperhead Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 being overweight isn't such a bad thing afterall http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/nation/3142605 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maro Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 Hey! I resemble that remark! graemlins/finger.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Posted April 19, 2005 Report Share Posted April 19, 2005 graemlins/bsflag.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Posted April 20, 2005 Report Share Posted April 20, 2005 roids Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OGRE Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 heard about this today, nothing we haven't already known. Really, how healthy is a male whos "normal" wieght at 6'1" is 163-180. Maybe a Kenyan marathon runner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ancientmysts Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Isn't America great? One of the only places in the world where it a bad thing to be a big person. Any other counrty in the world and you're considered wealthy if you're overweight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Maker Posted April 21, 2005 Report Share Posted April 21, 2005 Biostatistician Mary Grace Kovar, a consultant for the University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Center in Washington, said "normal" may be set too low for today's population.So what they are saying is that since people are getting fatter, why not just change the scales? Joel, alot of that has to do with body/bone structure (small, medium, large). BMI doesn't take that into account and is a horrible indicator for how 'healthy' a person really is. Obviously you have a large body (muscle) and bone structure so you are going to weight more than a smaller 6'1" person, assuming all other things being the same (body fat %). I probably would be considered a medium build for my height. I probably have around 10% body fat, maybe less (just a guess), weigh 165 and am 5'9". I just happen to be the stereotypical candidate for the BMI, sitting right at 25. But if I were a big guy and had the same body fat%, I'd be considered obese by the BMI standards. Body fat %, lung capacity, endurance, strength, blood pressure, cholesterol levels; these are all things that typify a 'healthy person' to me. The only thing that being in better shape in any of these things, or anything else anyone can think of is going to reduce your risk of developing certain health problems. I think it's pretty obvious that the opposite can also be said. But you could still be a 'healthy' person that is at a higher disposition, just because of genetics, than a person who is not 'healthy'. It’s only going to help you in your certain situation. You will also feel better mentally and physical all around. If someone can't see the benefits of not being a fat lazy ass, then let them be that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.