Mr. Jones Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 All it needed was a ricer wing, and all would have been gravy. No ducting or 1/2 million $ supercar design involved. Your going to compare the stability of a Dodge Colt w/ Ricer wing to a Porsche or Ferarri @ 200mph ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 Your going to compare the stability of a Dodge Colt w/ Ricer wing to a Porsche or Ferarri @ 200mph ? Find me one to compare it to and I would be more than happy. Besides, funny thing is most of the said vehicles can not even achieve 200mph . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cougar1647545494 Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 Find me one to compare it to and I would be more than happy. Besides, funny thing is most of the said vehicles can not even achieve 200mph . A geo with ricer wing and big motor? hey man. I'm trying, but you're extremely stretched to compare a colt to above said cars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 A geo with ricer wing and big motor? hey man. I'm trying, but you're extremely stretched to compare a colt to above said cars. I completly agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackbar00 Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 Different day. And I just spoke with the insurance company, the suit is still pending. It's no matter really, the damages the city claimed are well within my limits of liability, but just incase.... So you think that would make ANY difference? And somehow, I dont beleive you would try this stunt twice.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 So you think that would make ANY difference? And somehow, I dont beleive you would try this stunt twice.... What would make any difference? And, if you think I would not do it twice-you would already be wrong. It was “done” on more than one occasion, not one of witch being a truly smart decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suffocateXfaster1647545505 Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 I know that a few runs after this or what not it resulted in a crash. But christ how was the stability at those speeds? (Dumb question I know, just bear with me) It had to be hairy as all get out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 what stability.... di you not see the camera flying around like the Blair fuck Witch Project? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 It was dead on perfect unitl 185ish. Then it gets a little funky. After 200, its just you and the good lord keeping it straight, it definatly feels "on the edge". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief8one Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 i would never do that..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FOXBODY88STANG Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 200m.p.h. + shoe box= NUTS:zoom: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.