RC51 John Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 This has become a problem nation wide. The true issue if the kids are charged and convicted is the possibility the might have to register as a sex offender for 10 years. If I remember correctly the pictures have to be of a lewd and lascivious nature. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 exactly thats the problem. not that im for kiddie porn all the time, but what about the girls who sent them. are they getting anything for distributing it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC51 John Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 The girl might get the same treatment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 fair enough then. sucks that they are the ones to have examples made outta them. hell grab any high school kids phone and take a look, you will feel dirty for about a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremygsxr Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 fair enough then. sucks that they are the ones to have examples made outta them. hell grab kawi kids phone and take a look, you will feel dirty for about a week.fify Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cdubyah Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 I did a little research on this topic to answer some of your questions. In the state's eye this is considered sexual abuse.Making no effort to prevent child from observing sexual behavior; Disseminating or showing a child photographs, video and/or any pornographic material; Allowing/forcing child to view pornographic material; Photographing, videotaping and/or viewing child without clothing or partially clothed; Allowing child to be photographed, videotaped and/or viewed without clothing or partially clothed; Sexual activity between any child thirteen years of age or younger and any person(s) more than four years older in age. (this is a double rule, being if you are 20 you can't scrump at 16 yr old because of 4yrs difference)Here is where it gets tricky, this is not considered sexual abuse.Child sixteen years and older engaging in consensual contact with a non-related person(s) over the age of sixteen. Clear as mud isn't it??? Now the only question would be what they consider pornography. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redbarron77 Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 Damn close, but even the amish don't sleep with their sheep. That's rich coming from my #1 customer...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yotaman88210 Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 This will be thrown out because, while the school had the right to take the cell phones from the students due to using them at the wrong time, they had no right, without a court order, to search the phones. I hope the students sue for invasion of privacy, and illegal search and seizure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremygsxr Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 This will be thrown out because, while the school had the right to take the cell phones from the students due to using them at the wrong time, they had no right, without a court order, to search the phones. I hope the students sue for invasion of privacy, and illegal search and seizure.+1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted January 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 This will be thrown out because, while the school had the right to take the cell phones from the students due to using them at the wrong time, they had no right, without a court order, to search the phones. I hope the students sue for invasion of privacy, and illegal search and seizure.Doubt it. On school property the school has every right to search. They can search your bookbags, jackets, etc. Hell, my high school had drug dogs come through every couple weeks. If the dogs smelled something in your locker or on you, you got searched. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 I did a little research on this topic to answer some of your questions. In the state's eye this is considered sexual abuse.Making no effort to prevent child from observing sexual behavior; Disseminating or showing a child photographs, video and/or any pornographic material; Allowing/forcing child to view pornographic material; Photographing, videotaping and/or viewing child without clothing or partially clothed; Allowing child to be photographed, videotaped and/or viewed without clothing or partially clothed; Sexual activity between any child thirteen years of age or younger and any person(s) more than four years older in age. (this is a double rule, being if you are 20 you can't scrump at 16 yr old because of 4yrs difference)Here is where it gets tricky, this is not considered sexual abuse.Child sixteen years and older engaging in consensual contact with a non-related person(s) over the age of sixteen.Clear as mud isn't it??? Now the only question would be what they consider pornography.did you say scrump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cdubyah Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 Scrump, screw, fuck, bone, yoink, makin bacon, whatever you want to call it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 scrump is my word!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.