wagner Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 All of these are raw, not photochop, and thanks to Nic for providing the location http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_8900.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_8940.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_9055.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_9086.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_9180.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_9202.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_9238.jpg http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/IMG_9256.jpg Full album http://s35.photobucket.com/albums/d178/lt1wagner/CR%207-16%20Photo%20Shoot/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimTaylor751647545500 Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 (edited) Good pics. Edited July 17, 2011 by TimTaylor75 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codyh Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 (edited) More pics from ME! http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/xmod_supra/029.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/xmod_supra/098.jpg WASNT SURE WHICH ONE I LIKED MORE BETWEEN THESE??? ^^^ Or down??? http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/xmod_supra/102.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/xmod_supra/112-1.jpg http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/xmod_supra/127.jpg I took 153 and this is all I kept... :gabe: Edited July 17, 2011 by Wagner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 My car is shiny and has tires. Happy Good pics Cody, that camera qas as big as you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickey4271647545519 Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Not gonna lie, in codys pics the cars look like hotwheels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve R. Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 More pics from ME! Most of those are underexposed, what camera are you using? Wagner - Great pics as always. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagner Posted July 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Cody I had to remove some of those pics, Zac and scott told you not to post... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Most of those are underexposed, what camera are you using? It's not the camera. FWIW, he's using a 10yr old D60. It's a decent camera. The exposure appears to have been caused because he was in full manual mode and had the shutter speed too high. 1/350th on those shots when he easily could have gotten away with 1/125th at that 70mm range. If they were shot RAW, it can be fixed without much issue. I can probably even fix the jpeg. More to come. Overall, the shots of Wagner's car work mainly because of the angle. Again, getting low like that is one technique that works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagner Posted July 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 It's not the camera. FWIW, he's using a 10yr old D60. It's a decent camera. The exposure appears to have been caused because he was in full manual mode and had the shutter speed too high. 1/350th on those shots when he easily could have gotten away with 1/125th at that 70mm range. If they were shot RAW, it can be fixed without much issue. I can probably even fix the jpeg. More to come. Overall, the shots of Wagner's car work mainly because of the angle. Again, getting low like that is one technique that works. I need.a.big boy lens That pavement was like.a hot griddle so.there was no way I.was doing a lot of low angle stuff. I need to learn me some photochop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I need.a.big boy lens I wouldn't say that man. My good friend Penney is a class act and just went to pro lenses in 2008. Prior to that she shot film and digital, and used many of those same old school consumer grade lenses for her shoots. It's about the lighting. Look through her stuff, go back to 2008 and look at her work. Consumer grade glass with an 8mp Canon 20D. I do a lot of reception work with her. She shoots the weddings, goes home and I take over from there. We trade off a lot of work together. Great photography. I'm a 2/10 compared to her. http://adlerhouse.com/ That pavement was like.a hot griddle so.there was no way I.was doing a lot of low angle stuff. I need to learn me some photochopI hear ya. I didn't read the post until around 9pm or else I would have shown up there too. The MS3 was clean and I was itching to get out. Here's the best I could do with the second image given it's a highly compressed low res jpeg. http://www.pbase.com/timothylauro/image/136489654/original Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
codyh Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I need.a.big boy lens That pavement was like.a hot griddle so.there was no way I.was doing a lot of low angle stuff. I need to learn me some photochop I didnt even know i posted pics that they didnt want... I didnt even know they didnt want pics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagner Posted July 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I didnt even know i posted pics that they didnt want... I didnt even know they didnt want pics. No worries, but they did tell you some of those were not to be posted here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Littleguy Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Nice pictures. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erica Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Nice pics! Thanks Brian and Cody! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 No worries, but they did tell you some of those were not to be posted here. Super Secret pics..... oh noes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve R. Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 (edited) It's not the camera. FWIW, he's using a 10yr old D60. It's a decent camera. The exposure appears to have been caused because he was in full manual mode and had the shutter speed too high. 1/350th on those shots when he easily could have gotten away with 1/125th at that 70mm range. If they were shot RAW, it can be fixed without much issue. I can probably even fix the jpeg. More to come. Overall, the shots of Wagner's car work mainly because of the angle. Again, getting low like that is one technique that works. I just want to express that I never thought it was the camera. It was a statement followed by a question. I appreciate your vast knowledge, but sometimes you come off as assuming people are flat stupid. Edited July 17, 2011 by Steve R. made it meaner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I just want to express that I never thought it was the camera. It was a statement followed by a question. I appreciate your vast knowledge, but sometimes you come off as assuming people are flat stupid. Not sure why you took my comments that way I wasn't being condescending. Just as you had a statement followed by a question, I stated a fact answering your question and followed it up with supporting details as to what caused the underexposure. That is all. :no: However by your use of the statement and a question within a single sentence with a comma vs. two separate sentences it is completely plausible and grammatically correct to assume you did mean the underexposure was as a result of the camera being used. In terms of photography related topics here on CR I don't think I have ever treated anyone as if they are flat out stupid. I've always supported those with an interest in a very constructive manner and drove the creation of the digital darkroom for just that reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve R. Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 Not sure why you took my comments that way I wasn't being condescending. Just as you had a statement followed by a question, I stated a fact answering your question and followed it up with supporting details as to what caused the underexposure. That is all. :no: However by your use of the statement and a question within a single sentence with a comma vs. two separate sentences it is completely plausible and grammatically correct to assume you did mean the underexposure was as a result of the camera being used. In terms of photography related topics here on CR I don't think I have ever treated anyone as if they are flat out stupid. I've always supported those with an interest in a very constructive manner and drove the creation of the digital darkroom for just that reason. Well, looking back at it I suppose you were not trying to be condescending. I don't know why I took it that way. So, I apologize for being an ass about it. I do understand most of the basics with manually shooting a DSLR. Anyways I probably should have let it be informational for others and not act like you thought I was stupid. :fa: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cordell Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I had to post my ricer vid, now I want my hillbilly pics from Wagner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fubar231 Posted July 17, 2011 Report Share Posted July 17, 2011 I had to post my ricer vid, now I want my hillbilly pics from Wagner. I approve Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.