Mensan Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 There is no fair use section that covers it. I am not a public figure and it was specifically for harassment purposes. try again. Section 107 specifically covers it. I'd love to see the reaction if you took it to trial. It would be laughable and you know it. "But they made fun of me! I'm gonna SUE!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geeto67 Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 Section 107 specifically covers it. I'd love to see the reaction if you took it to trial. It would be laughable and you know it. "But they made fun of me! I'm gonna SUE!" sigh....you finished? section 107 only covers it if: 1) you are not an attorney and feel like interpreting it any which way you like 2) you ignore a hundred years of case law. the copyright office lays out how courts would weigh this: http://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html I guess the upside is that you are spending this afternoon learning about something you were previously ignorant of by researching it on the internet just so you can argue with some asshole you've never met. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hwilli1647545487 Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 sigh....you finished? section 107 only covers it if: 1) you are not an attorney and feel like interpreting it any which way you like 2) you ignore a hundred years of case law. FB was dope in 1916. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mensan Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 sigh....you finished? section 107 only covers it if: 1) you are not an attorney and feel like interpreting it any which way you like 2) you ignore a hundred years of case law. the copyright office lays out how courts would weigh this: http://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html I guess the upside is that you are spending this afternoon learning about something you were previously ignorant of by researching it on the internet just so you can argue with some asshole you've never met. There you go buddy! That's what I was talking about! Way to use facts to back up your argument! http://www.scarymommy.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/gold-star.jpg If you keep this up, you'll eventually earn some credibility! I'm glad I could lend a hand in your marked improvement. I'm so proud. Edit: I'm still confused about how the court would view the fourth factor and how the original copyright owner (i.e., NOT YOU) would have been affected: Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 So...since this is the political thread, does anybody want to talk about how the media isn't really talking about the FBI and it's apparent leak problem or the fact that the republicans aren't really back stopping James Comey even though he broke a longstanding tradition of the bureau to not interfere in elections. Is everyone cool with Sessions as the Attorney General, as well? So far, not only is the swamp not feeling drained at all, it's actually starting to look more like it did in the 1950's... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geeesammy Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 Is everyone cool with Sessions as the Attorney General, as well? So far, not only is the swamp not feeling drained at all, it's actually starting to look more like it did in the 1950's... Fuck yea, lock up or deport them minorities. I too was cool with the KKK until I learned they smoke pot. this is a joke for anyone that dumb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geeto67 Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 So far, not only is the swamp not feeling drained at all, it's actually starting to look more like it did in the 1950's... esp since we have people talking about internment camps and Newt Gingrich shouting for the comeback of the House Un-American Activities Committee (which he did back in june). https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/11/17/japanese-internment-is-precedent-for-national-muslim-registry-prominent-trump-backer-says/ http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/14/politics/newt-gingrich-house-un-american-activities-committee/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airwg2189 Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 Who, specifically, is talking about internment camps? A random Trump backer? You're worse than those stupid Facebook fake news clickbait articles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airwg2189 Posted November 18, 2016 Report Share Posted November 18, 2016 So...since this is the political thread, does anybody want to talk about how the media isn't really talking about the FBI and it's apparent leak problem or the fact that the republicans aren't really back stopping James Comey even though he broke a longstanding tradition of the bureau to not interfere in elections. Tradition != law. Comey did nothing wrong. Thank your CNN overlords for blowing his letter to Congress (which IS required by law) out of proportion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wagner Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 The butthurt and backlash continue to flow from all the talk show hosts and I love it. When does the mass move of the limousine liberals from Hollywood begin? I bet their garage sales will be bad ass for sure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10phone2 Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 As much as I would love to see it, there won't be any moves because the would require actual effort instead of complaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acklac7 Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 (edited) Mensan>(anyone)>acklac>geetoad A little late to the party - I tend to do Politics in large doses. Then quit. My take (and I was going to touch on this before I saw your post, Grant. How coincidental you mentioned the 3 of us) Kerry - You're a seriously smart Motherfucker, no denying that. Probably one of the smartest guys on here. Accept and recognize constructive criticism when you see it, especially from those who don't post that often. There's alot of smart people on here. Not everyone is trying to troll. Mensan gave you an honest, point-for-point peer review, sans personal attacks. It was a classy move that deserved a classy response, Which you 404'd at. I like your posts. I appreciate your knowledge. I believe you're an Asset here. I speak for many when I say damn-dude, you know some shit. I (along with many others) enjoy a lot of your posts. That said, try not to take everything as an attack - I know it can be difficult with people like Grantrums taking shots at every corner (why you so mad at Intellects, Grant?) Just try to keep in mind that not everyone on here is trying to hate. I know. It's hard. And, Mensan>Geeto>acklac>ForrestGump (the one from the movie)>Grant :gabe: Edited November 23, 2016 by acklac7 Prose n Shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 money>knowledge>schooling Maybe I say that because I'm not that smart #TBH Also, it could be that I have never been concerned with being smart about things that other people do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BStowers023 Posted November 21, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 money>knowledge>schooling Maybe I say that because I'm not that smart #TBH Also, it could be that I have never been concerned with being smart about things that other people do. Being good at what you do on a daily basis along with good work ethic is more important than knowing random political facts from 50 years ago to prove how "smart" you are, unless your job requires you to know that stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2highpsi Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 money>knowledge>schooling Intelligence>Knowledge>Money>lots of stuff>Schooling The difference between knowledge and intelligence is key here. Knowledge is the collection of skills and information a person has acquired through experience. Intelligence is the ability to apply knowledge. Just because someone lacks knowledge of a particular subject doesn’t mean they can’t apply their intelligence to help solve problems. Knowledge is wonderful, but it fades as techniques and technologies come and go. Intelligence sustains. Its borders extend beyond any technique or technology, and that makes all the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mensan Posted November 21, 2016 Report Share Posted November 21, 2016 Intelligence>Knowledge>Money>lots of stuff>Schooling This is a great post. There is a current philosophical argument about what knowledge actually is. It seems like a laughable topic, but if you read what people consider the definition of knowledge to be, and why the argument exists, it makes you question your knowledge. I'll see if I can find it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted November 22, 2016 Report Share Posted November 22, 2016 Knowledge is at your fingertips!!! http://www.google.com /sarcasm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unfunnyryan Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 This came up on my FB today https://www.facebook.com/events/1162913243829454/ Some of the post are the best part Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.