timotheus Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 In a deadly force encounter' date=' and the physiological effects it will put your body through, training is the ONLY thing that will save your ass. Once your heart rate starts climbing and you begin to lose hearing, your vision starts to tunnel and you lose finger dexterity you'll find training is the only thing you can rely on. Most CCW courses don't cover the adverse effects that a DFE will produce. Read up on it. It's pretty amazing, really.[/quote']i understand the value of training but it is not a guarantee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r1crusher Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 All I know is I used to bullseye womp rats in my T-16 back home, they're not much bigger than two meters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timotheus Posted March 10, 2010 Report Share Posted March 10, 2010 Sure' date=' but neither is carrying a gun. I think that's the one thing all of us can agree on. It's the part that hangs off the end of that thought that we disagree on. Just because the gun [i']may not be enough to stop a violent crime doesn't mean we should mark it off the list. I'm pretty sure the only person that was advocating that was the campus cop.. that carries on campus. Which makes him an elitist. Which is why I'm glad he left this thread. agreement at last Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremygsxr Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Same reason people have fire extinguishers. Firefighters can't be there right away, neither can LEOs.That's brilliant! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.