chevysoldier Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/polls/152649-poll-obama-approval-at-all-time-low1945-2009 Presidential approval rating comparison.http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-presapp0605-31.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFM Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Perspective.... Still 20 points higher than W..... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReconRat Posted March 30, 2011 Report Share Posted March 30, 2011 Comparing overall worst to current status doesn't say much.Try comparing the first two years of each instead.Obama then shows to be similar to both Reagan and Nixon.A rapid drop in the first two years, after a barely average start.Reagan finished up 8 years favorably, and Nixon impeached at five with almost the lowest. Nixon was 2nd overall worst rating, beaten only by Truman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Perspective.... Still 20 points higher than W.....Think what obama's would be if the media was out after him like they were for bush. The media made obama what he is. They built him up to his rockstar status and they can't let him fall from glory. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beegreenstrings Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 (edited) What your kidding, it's low.i dont think it was ever actually high? The media gave him that and everyone "believed" in "the change".BSOnly change needed is in 2012Someone that can bring our troops home and not redeploy them to some other shit hole country.Someone who can fix the issues with the country, not stupid F'in issues but real issues.Someone that will worry about our country, FIRST! Edited March 31, 2011 by Beegreenstrings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhaag Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Only change needed is in 2012Someone that can bring our troops home and not redeploy them to some other shit hole country.Someone who can fix the issues with the country, not stupid F'in issues but real issues.Someone that will worry about our country, FIRST!Ron Paul 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarvismb Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 Ron Jeremy 2012 ftfy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beegreenstrings Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 I say Ron White in 2012 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 What your kidding, it's low.i dont think it was ever actually high? The media gave him that and everyone "believed" in "the change".BSOnly change needed is in 2012Someone that can bring our troops home and not redeploy them to some other shit hole country.Someone who can fix the issues with the country, not stupid F'in issues but real issues.Someone that will worry about our country, FIRST!someone who will increase education funding so our kids can learn the difference between your and you're. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevysoldier Posted March 31, 2011 Author Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 someone who will increase education funding so our kids can learn the difference between your and you're.You forgot to capitalize the first word in your sentence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 no i didnt. i knew exactly what i was doing. look i did it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redkow97 Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 approval ratings are meaningless. The 2012 election is the only "approval rating" that matters, and even then, Obama doesn't have to be doing a good job; people just have to perceive him as less incompetent than whoever the republicans nominate. Frankly, I don't think the President should be encouraged, or (if possible) even allowed to see his approval ratings. If he's just going to do what makes him popular, then why make campaign promise? Why elect a president at all; we could just run a true democracy and have weekly votes on various issues.Maybe that's a great idea - I've advocated having the presidential election determined by phone voting. It works for American Idol. Sure, you get a Ruben Studardt every 5 or 6 election cycles, but we're getting worse results more often with the current 2-party system. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kawi kid Posted March 31, 2011 Report Share Posted March 31, 2011 The next election will be all about Obama. The republicans could have a monkey nominated for as much as it don't matter. If he is getting the sunshine blown up his ass like the last election he will get another four. If the media can't build him up anymore than they already have its over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.