Jump to content

One more reason not to go to New York


conn-e-rot

Recommended Posts

Reread the article. They are not saying that New York passed a law making it legal. What the article is saying is that the current law does not provide sufficient wording that causes viewing to be illegal.

current New York law, "it is illegal to create, possess, distribute, promote or facilitate child pornography."

What they are saying is a ruling against some convicted pervert is getting reversed on appeal because nowhere does it say that viewing falls into the above categories. The scum never downloaded the images so therefore gets off on a loophole in the law and the way technology works. The guy is no less guilty but he payed for a good enough lawyer and just as it is in any part of our society he has payed for his freedom. I am sure that the wording of the current law will be fixed very soon.:nono:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reread the article. They are not saying that New York passed a law making it legal. What the article is saying is that the current law does not provide sufficient wording that causes viewing to be illegal.

What they are saying is a ruling against some convicted pervert is getting reversed on appeal because nowhere does it say that viewing falls into the above categories. The scum never downloaded the images so therefore gets off on a loophole in the law and the way technology works. The guy is no less guilty but he payed for a good enough lawyer and just as it is in any part of our society he has payed for his freedom. I am sure that the wording of the current law will be fixed very soon.:nono:

NY laws still suck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I figured as well. Just like they go after the drug dealers more than the users.

Reread the article. They are not saying that New York passed a law making it legal. What the article is saying is that the current law does not provide sufficient wording that causes viewing to be illegal.

What they are saying is a ruling against some convicted pervert is getting reversed on appeal because nowhere does it say that viewing falls into the above categories. The scum never downloaded the images so therefore gets off on a loophole in the law and the way technology works. The guy is no less guilty but he payed for a good enough lawyer and just as it is in any part of our society he has payed for his freedom. I am sure that the wording of the current law will be fixed very soon.:nono:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you Google something and kiddie porn accidently shows up, are you guilty of a crime? You didn't save it but its in your history right? Before someone asks what you'd be Googling for...in grade school in grade school i wss searching online for a report. Don't remember what it was about but next I got a pop up...well we'll just say it was farm related.

I understand the premise of this but haven't decided which side of the fence I'm on. It'll come down to application of it. Is 5000 images in a cache an accident? Prob not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consider this scenario: surfing amateur Web cam porn. You can't know for certain the age of the sluts on those videos, and maybe you click on one and then feel that the girl is underage, so you click away from it. That video is still in your cache. I can see how this law would potentially protect someone from a prison term who obviously doesn't deserve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consider this scenario: surfing amateur Web cam porn. You can't know for certain the age of the sluts on those videos, and maybe you click on one and then feel that the girl is underage, so you click away from it. That video is still in your cache. I can see how this law would potentially protect someone from a prison term who obviously doesn't deserve it.

That's why you only surf grannyfanny.com. you know they're over 18.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consider this scenario: surfing amateur Web cam porn. You can't know for certain the age of the sluts on those videos, and maybe you click on one and then feel that the girl is underage, so you click away from it. That video is still in your cache. I can see how this law would potentially protect someone from a prison term who obviously doesn't deserve it.

Yeah but here you do that in this state you are fucked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but here you do that in this state you are fucked

Well no shit, that's why in certain circumstances this law isn't a bad idea. I'm not advocating child porn, just saying it would be a real shame to go to prison for accidentally seeing a 17 year old titty on a poorly regulated website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...