Isn't that one of the main grievances that Martin Luther had with the Catholic church?
I don't understand how Athieism is a religion. I'm not trying to argue with you, I just would like to have this cleared up. It would seem to me that a lack of belief does not constitute a religion. Wikipedia defines Religion as:
"A controversial term sometimes used interchangeably with faith, is commonly defined as belief concerning the supernatural, sacred, or divine, and the moral codes, practices and institutions associated with such belief. In its broadest sense some have defined it as the sum total of answers given to explain humankind's relationship with the universe. In the course of the development of religion, it has taken an almost infinite number of forms in various cultures and individuals. However, religion today is dominated by a number of major world religions."
So according to that, religion is basically the same as faith. Athieism seems to me to be a lack of faith, therefore the opposite of religion.
Anarchy is a lack of government. Stability is not even an issue if there is no government to be stable.
More Wikipedia definitions so that you can see where I am coming from:
Anarchy
Atheism
Under their definition for atheism, I can kind of understand their second definition, "Strong atheism," as being a religion, but they also say on there that it's not the commonly used definition.