Jump to content

caseyctsv

Members
  • Posts

    2,425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by caseyctsv

  1. Used parts - (thanks Wease)

     

    Cam - 250

    Headers - 300

    MSD wires - 50

    ASP underdrive pulley - 75

     

    New parts - performance

     

    Comp cam valve springs - 200

    Thunder Racing Pushrods - 180

    Corsa exhaust - 675

    UMI suspension - 350

    Hotchkis springs - 200

    Short shifter - 50

    Off road Y-pipe - 100

    SLP lid - 100

    Tune / dyno time - 300

     

    New parts - show

     

    Wheels / tires - 1400

    Tint - 150

    Gauges - 150

     

     

    About 2800 in performance parts netted me a ~80 RWHP gain over stock. The car dyno'd at 332 with a lid and cat back, 383 with the full boltons and cam. It was never dyno's completely stock. All of the parts were installed in my garage with the help of others in Cofba.

     

    I don't think 2800 is too bad but the car was not real cheap - 24,900 4 years ago.

  2. I played around with a guy in a SL55AMG last year on 161. It was a sweet looking / sounding car. I could tell the guy was a little pissed his 120K+ roadster could not pull away from me cleanly. They are impressive. To have all of that power without having to be loud or any other vices.
  3. Hey guys COFBA (Central Ohio F-Body) is getting together at Jegs in Reynoldsburg on Saturday, April 21st at 9:00 pm. Just looking to see some of the F-Bodies out there. It looks like the weather is going to cooperate so if you are out and about stop by and introduce yourself.
  4. Sorry - Mallard's post is a great way to end the thread but I still have this to add:

     

    My 99 Grand Prix with the ANCIENT pushrod 3800 motor has 140K miles on it and over the last 12 months my avg fuel economy is 23.7 mpg. That is 50/50 highway and city. I have a Motor Trend here that has a long term test on a 2006 BMW 330i. Do we all agree that the 3 series is "similar sized"? The Grand Prix is larger and heavier but that will help me make my point. Their test's MPG avg? 19.9 combined MPG. So the incredible GERMAN engineers at BMW can't make a motor that gets better gas mileage than my 8 yr old Grand Prix? I mean my car has freakin pushrods in it!

     

    The advantages of OHC vs pushrod come mostly in the NVH factors not in "efficiency".

     

    You listed the Mustang GT 4.6 vs the GTO does it matter that the GTO makes 100 horsepower more??

     

    I will repeat the thoughts that have been posted above a couple of times. GMs problems with CAFE have everything to do with product mix not by the efficiency of their motors.

  5. THE CARS ARE NOT EXPENSIVE BECAUSE OF THEIR MOTORS. You pay more for the car, and you get ALOT more car for the money.

     

    You cannot be serious. While it is true that there is a lot more to the car than the motor they can get away with expensive technology and materials in the drivetrain when you are talking a 65K+ car. Isn't the A8 all aluminum as well? GMs cars are just fine on gas mileage. They are competitive or better in every class. You can pick on their build quality, cheap plastics, poor design, and "ancient pushrod tech", but not on their fuel efficiency. GM's CAFE numbers are being dragged down by all of their trucks and SUVs, something Audi and BMW do not have to deal with. The only area I see GM lacking is in diesel technology. The Duramax in GMs trucks shows they are capable but they have not yet transferred this technology to cars.

  6. D16z6 > 4.6 > Lt1 > Ls1

     

     

    You must have gone to Columbus Public Schools. Clearly you do not know how to use the "greater than" or "less than sign".

     

    I keep waiting for Nitrousbird to step in and defend the LT1

×
×
  • Create New...