Jump to content

caseyctsv

Members
  • Posts

    2,425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by caseyctsv

  1. Nope - Linn told them he could deliver Toretto.
  2. Let me get a fressh clutch and a line lock and I would be glad to tangle with the vette (at the track of course);-)
  3. It probably won't fit your Z man - it won't clear the cowl. Welcome to the site John - Darrin and I are sitting around the campfire sharing a few laughs at your expense unfortunately. You fell victim to CR hazing - check out some of the other newb threads - the harder you fight the worse it gets. Better to take your lumps! Car looks awesome hope I get to see it soon. Oh and no I don't want to race it but I would be happy to take on your TBSS - lol.
  4. Isn't that Barack Obama?
  5. I am going to this finally - was out of town the last few years.
  6. The LT1s did - 96 and 97 LT1s had 2 cats. All LS1s have 2 cats. For what its worth the cats for an LS1 do not require the hump in the passenger floor but GM did not want to go through the expense of redesigning it.
  7. For all of the self-proclaimed life time bachelors / playas your future.... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xnk2unJrVDs&feature=related
  8. There is a lot of stupidity in this thread. Good luck man - it will not be easy on anyone involved.
  9. They were slower (another one of those situations where the legend is bigger than the facts): http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/classic/112_0310_pontiac/photo_11.html I know there were probably packages that were quicker, better drivers, needed better tires, yada yada but the facts remain the newer ones are faster than the "legend".
  10. A modern GTO will walk a classic GTO - not sure if that is what you meant by performing like the original (we won't even go into handling as that is not even in question. As pointed out above the GTO was not a competitor of the Evo / WRX. The Mustang is a better comparison. Again the problem was with the styling not the performance. The GTO ran to 60 in under 5 seconds and was an easy 13 second car in stock form with 400+ horsepower. It got good gas mileagae to boot and had the most refined interior in GM's arsenal.
  11. Define "under perform"? The first time was not a failure - not the blockbuster they had hoped it would be but they did not lose money on the project. It did not do as well as they hoped due to the styling not the performance.
  12. Westerville....what a surprise. Clearly they have nothing else better to do.
  13. Bought a Voyager a week ago (did not know about the Dare coming out). I really like the features on the Voyager - I really like it and would not have considered any other brand than LG. I have had both Motorolas (3 or 4) and Samsung - 1 - both were junk compared to my LGs.
  14. Saw one at the Hooters show - car is about 3 sizes too big. You are right pics do not do the car justice - they do not show how freakin huge they are! It was nice looking though.
  15. Man that sucks - don't you touch my car!
  16. I actually agree with you on this one. Paul has to be trying to spell that poorly.
  17. Something tells me that is not going to help.
  18. Thanks Bill. Picks looks great as usual! I need an 08 Z06 with a TT427 with all of the trimmings.
  19. <------Jealous. Congrats man looks great
  20. Vacation owns me this weekend....lol
  21. Do yourself a favor and ride in an LS1 with true duals dumping before the axle before you buy. They sound great outside the car but will rattle your teeth inside the car.
  22. 80-83 Honda Civic?? Someone who knows chime in - that thing is crazy
×
×
  • Create New...