TheHaze

That's knowledge-based and I still think you'd get a run for your money.

Last year, I witnessed 5-6 green seat sellouts. Though, it seems like attendance is lower this season so far and that might make a difference. This year I've sat in the 3rd row on the home-attack end a few times thank to my buddy who has season tickets.

I've had them for a ton of games. The booths open for sale 2 hours before the game, so if it starts at 7pm ticket sales begin at 5pm. However, they only sell around 2-300 tickets I believe so you'll need to be in line no later than 4pm.

Buick sechs?

Does he hate male sechs?

Nash just had a great goal in the first 2 mins versus Dallas. That is what the Jackets need; early pressure and guys like Nash actually going out and making plays. EDIT: ...and as I hit enter for this post, Dallas scores a sub-par goal on Leclaire.

You may have more sense than originally expected. gratz

He did, but only because he resented the education system. He actually wrote several scientific and mathematics books while he was a teenager. I had one of his quotes in my signature once, but he has a ton of great thoughts: "Imagination is more important than knowledge." "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." "Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." I don't think an IQ test can properly measure any person's brain power.

That list can easily be titled "America's best mall foods".

I hate them as well. If you try to get the Green seats 2 hours before the game begins, most of the people in line have Wings jerseys on.

I've been a fan since the beginning and still don't get them. They nearly dominated San Jose the previous meeting as well, even on their home turf. I was going to go tonight but I opted to watch it at home because I'm sick of spending money on a losing ticket.

Sure it can be proven wrong. You mentioned a physical place in our solar system in which a false-biological creature would most likely have little chance surviving. This is the kind of situation science belongs to, as you used objects and locations that we know exist or are at least based off of something we know exists. You should read up John Locke's philosophy of religion. Though he is clearly a deist, he brought on some heavy arguments or at least interesting factors. This relates to your post because you used Saturn and unicorns as examples, though those are things we can imagine or comprehend. That is, they're based off of things that can be proven but are used as a preposterous argument. Locke often argued that a God is the only thing in existence that has not derived from anything we've seen or experienced.

I often ponder this as well.

I often ponder this as well.

The color is a bit flamboyant but they're still neat cars.

I'm not so sure I want to experience any "man snow".

Those poor white supremacists. Always being judged.

He called himself a racial slur.

I reckon both are possible.

If I must be labeled first, than I guess I am agnostic, though my beliefs go beyond any one religion. I see a large trend here. There's a lot of questioning of religion and faith by way of scientific evaluation. How can an atheist really make an earth-based scientific claim about something that is incomprehensible? That can go for faith-goers as well, but they're not looking for proof obviously. If there is a creator, most of this debate is useless because none of what has been said can pertain to a non-worldly entity. What I have read in this thread is the typical black versus white arguments of how "what you can't see, can't exist" or "my faith is my proof". This argument goes way beyond what we have come to know on this earth. Any rationale person can't deny a possibility in something, aka agnosticism. As to the original disaster, errr, I mean Thorne; you now call yourself an atheist because things in life haven't gone your way. I think you need to step back and ask yourself about the conflicts in your life instead of blaming them on a religion. Most of the religious folk I have met did not look for answers or signs from their God but rather tried to follow a few guidelines to better themselves. It seems to me that you were looking in to Christianity in the wrong light, or any religion in that manner. I think most of the hatred thrown at religion is stemmed from something more personal within that person.

<<<<Embraced in his fully evolved self.

I made wings last night with Frank's. Mmmmmmmm

Stop rubbing it in my e-face. Oh well, you take all of your tasty snacks and I'll keep my coconut-rich balls.

Godamnit, I concede.

Show me something that has equally tasty and moist chocolatey goodness and marshmallow packed all in one delicious treat.