Fact-checking is always good, even if fact-checking sources can be as biased as anyone else, sample questions can be leading, pools can be concentrated, so on, so forth. I think the more information one explores, the better to draw conclusions one becomes. Here's an interesting piece from Huffpo about Jury Instruction.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alafair-burke/george-zimmerman-jury-instructions_b_3596685.html
Even if I disagree with the conclusion that the judge basically decided the verdict, the evidence would still call for a Not Guilty, IMO, it's interesting to read. What the video I posted best draws attention to is the narrative of "Zimmerman the racist profiler", his history defending a black man who was beaten, and giving some history to the neighborhood problems with burglaries and theft, and why he may have been suspicious of those he didn't recognize regardless of race. No one in their right mind would look at a picture of Zimmerman and call him "white", but our media initially and incorrectly reported "white man kills skittle-snacking 12 yr old unarmed black child" so we move to "well he's a white-hispanic" to keep the circus lights flashing. For once a Facebook meme was spot-on. Zimmerman is as much a white-hispanic, as Obama is a white-African.