M0nk3y

It all depends on what you want to do with it. I use to play airsoft for military simulation purposes (aka mags hold limited round count, have to complete certain objectives on dedicated land that had insurance specifically for this at 100+ acres) Anyways, you can get really expensive or really cheap. If you're just going to plink with the gun then there is no sense on buying a $400+ gun. In the end, you can buy a pretty decent base model and make it your own. I owned a CA M16 that I converted into a DMR. It shot 450 FPS with 0.2g BB's, and had a range of around 300+ feet. I loved it, but it was a money pit: http://www.airsoftohio.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1223&pictureid=9822 GLWS OP.

I was out around noon with the storm hit Dayton. It was pretty much white out conditions, but the roads were perfectly fine with a inch or so of fresh snow down. A combination of poor driver skill, no winter tires, and people not paying attention lead to all of these probably.

Good job young grasshopper!

Well done Kale! Not bad results at all for your second time. It only gets better from here. Now enjoy being sore for a couple days...it'll hit you sooner or later, even though you just sit next to a car...lol

Yea, I read more after posting and saw it's not the whole truth Raven Concealment posted it on their FB page and I copied and pasted

VERY INTERESTING http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/09/Backfire-Obamacare-Forbids-Gun-and-Ammo-Registration

I own a S&W 22A. Great little pistol can be had around ~$200 Just needs to be cleaned, or else some FTF can occur with a dirty feed ramp (we're talking like 500 rounds in-between cleaning)

:lolguy: @ this thread. That is all

Can you link me to their ordering page? All I can see is vintage ammo

I wouldn't buy online ammo right now. Prices skyrocketed and with shipping costs you can find them in stores for less. Is it in-store only? Their website sucks.

Link to news story. The story above is kinda fabricated. Girlfriend wasn't working. 4 Shots - 1 Hit http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Two-wounded-in-theater-shooting-4122668.php http://www.woai.com/news/local/story/Deputy-shoots-gunman-at-San-Antonio-movie-theater/2wFsix5ntU2CDrsHjXx2kQ.cspx http://www.theblaze.com/stories/man-attempts-to-open-fire-on-crowd-at-movie-theater-armed-off-duty-sheriffs-deputy-drops-him-with-one-bullet/

Good job screwing up the video by using youtube's recommendation to fix the shakiness

Drove the Evo today. Not impressed. STi they would not let me drive because of weather. Bastards. I'm going to see if I can get away with a 2 door. Thinking 128i with a STX build. Or 135i for STU? They are cheaper than Evo and STi, and I can get CPO. Win win?

You got it. I will have to add money ontop of it per month because it will not completely cover, but only like $50 if I can get a decent down payment. After reading more, I'm going towards the Evo as well.

I get compensation and a set number of gallons of gas monthly. I'd rather want it to be new. The company doesn't dictate a specific year, It's just my personal preference. It's a 4 door to hauling clients, yes. I'm not involved with sales, so I will never do it...but I still have to obey the same set rules. I will mostly be driving out to jobsites with other employees to walk around buildings. I love autocrossing my Z4M, don't get me wrong. But it will never be competitive, and even if the car is allowed into STR, the cost to mod into STR versus a Evo or STI into STU is much more money. I'd rather be content with beating on a 30k car, versus one that is 55k+ (retail). Same set of rules apply to track. The EVO and STI already contain BBKs, and other goodies that would be much more expensive to mod on a Z4M. For example, a cat-back exhaust on the Z4M runs around $3k. STI you're looking at a $1k. Just my personal opinions.

Not titled by company. I will own it. Rings, I'm up in Cleveland. I'm going to test drive a STI and Evo Saturday

With finally getting a job (Just coming out of college), comes time to get a new car for DD and a AWD car. I currently drive and autocross a Z4M (RWD, 2 Door, Doesn't drive in winter) Company policy requires a 4-door. So, I was considering the thought of buying a '13 Subaru STI or WRX (don't really know which yet) and modding into STU. Sure as hell would be cheaper and easier to be competitive with that car versus my Z4M (RTR, AS, BSP and possible STR), and I don't have to worry about breaking anything on the M where it would cost twice as much. I would track the car as well (probably only once or twice a year). My thought is that the STI has a diff controller already, BBK, more boost...etc. It would be smarter to invest into a car like that rather than buying a WRX and adding this stuff later on. The M would just be a weekend and summer car for me. So anyone with valuable opinions please chime in. I was mainly concerned about the dreaded ringland failure. With an autocross car, and short gearing...I fear bouncing the car off the limiter, and blowing the car. I'm no foreign to stiff suspension. Even though I am on stock suspension with my M, it's progressive rates and torsional body ratings are fairly stiff. Probably will be running AST 4200 or similar suspension. Going to test drive a STI Saturday, I will hop into a WRX as well probably. Mainly looking at the 5-door, I like them. Not looking to purchase until June-Oct of next year. Just thinking ahead. Would consider a Evo X. But after I add HID headlights the price skyrockets. Not to mention I have to have leather in order to have heated seats....etc. Still considering this as an option as well. Please and thank you in advance.

N54 is the motor. They are prone to High Pressure Fuel Pump issues.

N54 in a 07 is asking for HPFP

As a red car owner, I disagree.

The big concrete pad hasn't been unlocked yet by Cincy SCCA (Right now they use the employee lot) There is a national tour scheduled for Wilimington, which will use the concrete. But however, it has not been officially confirmed though

2007 The 98-02 is a Z3M. 98-00 has the S52, 01-02 has the S54 For others that are wondering, this is for SCCA autocross. The bottom letter is correct, as it asks for the Z4M to be classed into STR. The top letter, got mis-interpreted or something...because that's clearly a Z3M

Hello all, January Fastrack came out, and while my letter (#9268) failed miserable with having the SEB think that the Z4M was produced 1998-2002 (even though I mentioned the 06-08 year period). There was another letter which I need your help with. Here is what I need you to write about: Quote: #9268 Z4 M Roadster Classing Add the 2001-2002 model years to BMW M Roadster and M Coupe listing in STR. It will then read as follows: BMW M Roadster and M Coupe (1998-2002) That isn't a Z4M, ugh. Please note that for the letter below Please submit comments regarding this though: Quote: #9887 Z4 Roadster/Coupe in STR The STAC would like member feedback on the possibility of classing the Z4-based M Roadster and Coupe in STR for 2012 (initial classing). These cars would have the best acceleration in the class, though would be hampered in handling by being among the heaviest. With your help, hopefully I can find a happy home in a ST class Thanks all.

Either would be good for a beginner. The 5100 has better ISO range, and I'm pretty sure they use the same crop sensor (I could be wrong on this though). My shots with a D3100. I'd still say I'm a beginner:

Can't wait to see how the Acura turns out. Have fun!