They mentioned on and off duty police, reserve police, retired police and military, firefighters, etc. I wholly disagree with you. In no way would I advocate active duty military protecting our schools. Banning assault rifles is a feel-good measure. Gun free zones are feel-good measures. Etc. At least with someone armed in a school, there would've been a fighting chance. Without, it was literally like shooting fish in a bucket. I agree. The NRA speech today went along the same lines, and they even said they'd fund it. National School Shield. They are developing the courses and training, and will train any volunteers interested. No schools would be forced into it, but all schools would be welcome to participate.Like I said, I've never been a huge fan of the NRA. However, they're the first to come to the table with a real, logical proposition to resolve this issue of gun violence in our schools. Laws don't work. If they did, the shooters would've abided by the gun free zone and homicide laws. Criminals aren't law-abiding citizens. Creating more laws simply isn't a logical solution.