John

which would ensure the nuking of america. i mean, do you think the chinese would rest until a nuclear bomb of their own went off here? there is a term, mutual assured destruction. china has second strike capabilities. they got a lot of help building nukes from the russians, so they could have some variant of the dead hand system where nukes are automatically launched back by a computer, even if everyone is dead. they also have submarine launched missiles in service too, so they could hit back that way as well. it would probably be the end of the world. but really, i think the whole thing is moot, because why would china want to attack us? we are their number one trading partner. we buy all the junk they make. we are making them rich. i guess they could want to deter us from intervening in taiwain or something...

i will be partying here

why is it called jersey shore when they are in miami and only one person on the show is actually from jersey?

they should have just gone over there with some rifles and done something about it.

connecticut? seriously east coast > west coast. everyone knows that.

because you're gay and you can tell when other people are gay?

do minority groups have any real chance of winning now?

not chopped very well either. i can tell its a chop from some of the pixels, and from seeing quite a few chops in my time.

so this morning arash markazi posted a less than flattering article on LBJ, which disappeared a shortly after. presumably because ESPN sucks lebrons dick and it made him look like an immature egomaniac. ESPN claims that it was a "rough draft" that was "inadvertently published". so later today nbc sports has this story on their front page: http://outofbounds.nbcsports.com/2010/07/-espn-mysteriously-pulls.html.php link to the cached original article http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/columns/story%3fid%3d5416131&d=66754466358425&mkt=en-US&setlang=en-US&w=e2b28bc9,b8f1ca5c

i was gonna say 40, but 20 works too

TO 2006 receptions: 85, 2007: 81, 2008: 69, 2009: 55 anyone else see a pattern here?

you're right. they said the law only applies when the party has an expectation of privacy (like on the phone). a cop on a public street does not.

i want a dorsoduro.

this is whats wrong with america:

what the rider did is moot. the real point is the retaliatory actions by the PD and court system.

hay look at me. i spent 90,000 dollars on a 270hp car

yeah i saw those too. may just end up getting one from there. ive had my eye on ebay, but they seem few and far between on there. and chevysoldier, i dont collect. i have a 1973 bike and i want to put the 73 plate on it.

well no shit captain obvious.

the 8th. not this coming sunday but the one after.

if you have an extra, i could def. try to make it. im kinda pissed at IRL right now though, after last week's shenanigans at the end of the race.

anyone have one lying around their garage they want to part with?

def. not peanut butter. some other kid may be allergic and could trade lunches and die.

all of this "enforce the law consistently" stuff is what causes kids to get expelled from school for having a butter knife. well the rules say no knives. they dont make an exception for butter knives. and rules are rules... sorry bout it. people need to use a little more discretion i think. another question: is a kid selling lemonade a business?

this shit is clearly retailatory. his video showed the cop being a dickweed. they arent happy that they are portrayed as anything other than awesome defenders of society, so they start raiding his parents house to show him "we are more powerful than you". way to go assholes. you're really making yourselves look good.