Scotty2Hotty

Back splash from the toilet when I drop a big poo.

I hate liberals, please get struck by lightning and be eaten by a large aligator.

:nod: I do love hearing the old Vietnam vets talking about their M16 with their 1:12 twist rifles. The stories of entry to exit wounds are quite true thanks to the tumbling effect of the round itself. Not to mention, most of the rounds were 45 grain rounds. 55 and 62 grain M855 is like a damn ice pick, goes in and right out.

1:7 is a closer ratio, so therefore it'll stabilize the larger grain rounds, and be a little more accurate at distance. SDMR Rifles that the AMU built are 1:7 barrels.

http://i.cr3ation.co.uk/dl/s2/gif/mrtlol.gif

http://tiptoetiff.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/om-nom-nom-nom.jpg

http://whiteboard.themuuj.com/whiteboard/2007-05-31-ZOMG!.jpeg

Not so much. You have different twists of the barrels, and what it's lined with. 1:9 twist is standard, but with the 1:7 varients I've seen, the 77 grain Black Hills tends to fly pretty good.

All he had to do was ask about Diamonds.

I heard he's gonna be an 11B aka bullet sponge with the 75th Ranger Batt Boys. He's gonna need some luck, cause they'll show his cherry ass no mercy I'm not sure which Batt he's goin to, but I'm assuming he's headed to Ft.Lewis, Washington. FYI, for those that don't know, the Rangers are pretty fuckin hardcore. I commend him for goin balls deep into this one.

I still think all weapons and decisions to field weapons should be the soul responsibility of the AMU in the Army.

http://www.10-8forums.com/ubbthreads/postimages/40052-MilitaryAssaultRifleWPcopy.jpg http://www.10-8forums.com/ubbthreads/postimages/40050-556_68AKmag.jpg From what I understand these are tests conducted by the US Army.

Only Steeler's fans have towels. :jerkit:

http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/iasipmain.jpg

http://kjzz.org/news/arizona/archives/200701/buckeye/72735353_450.jpg +1 WIN

I heard New Albany had some up there. Maybe next year we can hold a zombie shoot someplace.

I can agree with that. Granted Goodguys isn't per say a "drag race" event, but there's plenty of big shows, not to mention we have some of the fastest tracks in America here.

Never heard if this was true or not, but has anyone done the 8.8 Ford rear axle swap? Maybe it was chatter going around, but wasn't sure if anyone ever attempted it.

Agreed 100% with the 96-98 cars. But as far as the S197 chasis concerns, there's minor changes from 05-08 to the 09 Mustang, as the 2010 is a exterior re-design, but so far everything from the 09 3V motor has stayed the same. -Personally after seeing/driving/working on the S197, it's twice the car the SN95 platform was. (This is my opinion, love it or hate it.)

Last I checked the 2010 is still an S197 (DC2) platform, per say it's not much different.

BDS has been one of the best companies we've ever worked with. They've been catering to almost all of the GM truck line, so I'll check tomorrow for availibility and price on a kit. The only other companies that are even worth while other than BDS would be Skyjacker and Fabtech in my opinion. There's a few other companies like Rough Country that aren't bad either, but from personal experience the BDS has been the best to date.

Should do Hooters tomorrow night..................

I always say build it for what YOU want it for. Those Dana 60's are fucking animals, especially with repeated 4K+ clutch dumping. I'd go 9in if I were building a straight up 1320 car or if I were packing a big cube motor. I'm still quite impressed with your intial #'s from your LQ4 build.

4L80E and 12-bolt/9in.

So in other words, the guy was making upper 400's basically? We talking Modular powered or Swapped with pushrod power? SN95 body or S197 body style? 03-04 = SN95/05+= S197