Jump to content

Disclaimer

Members
  • Posts

    15,452
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Posts posted by Disclaimer

  1. I bet they are "self insured" and he signed a subrogation letter. His argument will be that the restaurant should pay for the dental work not the american people

    ^--- This, given Kucinich's ideologies, I'd guess this is the case. Congrats on winning the "word nerd of the day" award too, for subrogation. I haven't heard that in awhile, and last time I did, it was scary.

  2. my job relies on my to respond to certain issues as they occur and while waiting for such circumstances they don't mind internet usage.

    Really? You must be a lucky one then... 'cause I'm not gonna throw stones from my glass house.

  3. Casey isnt lying on that one. I dont know how many times I have heard stories from the Deputies going to a gov assistance housing on a call to see huge flat panel tvs, ps3, xbox's, Ipod etc.

    Awesome, that money is going right back into the economy and into the pockets of big business... who says the gov't is anti-business? :D

  4. People who milk the system aren't usually crack heads. They are people who know what the limitations on income restrictions are. So they stay under it to qualify. Most of whom have learned to work the system from the previous generation.

    There's no ambition like the ambition of the poor to stay poor. Gotta stay under that ceiling...

  5. seems like a great idea!!! obviously their decision making is flawed and thats how they got there

    I'm on board... we just need some sort of system (maybe stars? ID cards?) to identify the whole class of people who are poor so we can begin to concentrate them in a certain area, we'll call it a camp, for internment -- transporting them by train is probably the most cost-effective method.

  6. What symptoms are associated with these drugs? Do they have any interactions? If someone runs into hard times, who has a right to say what drugs someone must ingest into their body for some assistance? We should probably just corral up all the poor or unfortunate and make all their choices for them.

  7. Honestly if someone is on Gov't assistance I 100% believe that they should be on an implanted birth control. I bet that would fix more problems than the drug test would solve

    And you enforce this how? Sure, I can agree, but the process has to be reversible because some people aren't on welfare or unemployment forever. There are more than a few members on this site that have used gov't assisstance before and still are...

    The surgical method probably isn't the way to go here. Maybe instead of sending checks out, the welfare/unemployed have to figure out someway to get to the welfare office and the lady writing the checks has to physically observe the women swallowing a birth control pill? Only women would be able to pickup the checks though...

×
×
  • Create New...