CobraKevin Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 Summary: Extending from where the first one left off, Beatrix Kiddo (Uma Thurman) continues her quest to kill her former "master" Bill (David Carradine) for shooting her in the head during a wedding rehearsal 4 years earlier, leaving her in a coma for that entire time. Pros: More of a plot-oriented "movie", rather than a slasher action film like the first, great fight scenes, and both Uma and David did great. Cons: A few cheesy lines, but even those were tolerable. Other than that, not really anything that bad, other than IMO the storyline of revenge is just kinda plain. Overall: 4.25 stars. Definitely better than the first, definitely worth ticket money, and a semi-funny blooper at the end of the credits (though not really worth sitting through all of the credits to see). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 I saw it tonight. Fucking great. I can't really say it was better then the first one because they are one movie. It was just cut in half. It isn't possible to say one was better then the other. That's like saying one half of a hot dog tasted better then the other half. They're the same damn hot dog. Just my opinion. I would strongly recommend seeing this movie. Definitely watch Vol 1 first though. I will buy this DVD when it comes out. Already bought Vol 1. For originality and just fucking coolness, this movie gets: five muthafuckin' stars bitch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DagoRcR Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 Werd. It was crazy awsome. 4.5/5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berto Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 i'm kind of confused about this movie is it supposed to be like satirical comedy? the first one sucked ass, the second one was "ok". personally i think tarentino made a big mistake. and the only reason some people like it is b/c all their friends like it or b/c its a tarentino film i mean shit there were people clapping durin ga movie, reminded me os star wars/matrix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stvbreal Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 From what I saw on commercials it looks like a cheezy kungfu movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ronald-reagan Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 tarentino is a fucking genius. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraKevin Posted April 17, 2004 Author Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 Originally posted by StillPee: I can't really say it was better then the first one because they are one movie. It was just cut in half. It isn't possible to say one was better then the other. Sure can. The second half of the movie was better than the first half. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackson1647545504 Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 +1 and a 4.5/5 Vol 2 was a little slow for the first part but got better. IMO, a decent story told pretty well where liking tarantino files imuch is pretty much required. I'd certainly recomend seeing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cNeutron Posted April 17, 2004 Report Share Posted April 17, 2004 Originally posted by RX7dood: i'm kind of confused about this movie is it supposed to be like satirical comedy? the first one sucked ass, the second one was "ok". personally i think tarentino made a big mistake. and the only reason some people like it is b/c all their friends like it or b/c its a tarentino film i mean shit there were people clapping durin ga movie, reminded me os star wars/matrix.More so the opposite, people only dislike it because their friends didnt like it. If you actually watched it i find it hard for someone to dislike the movie. Granted I am not you and maybe you really jsut didnt like it. But it was a great movie....its not pulp fiction but still really good non the less Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaSSon Posted April 19, 2004 Report Share Posted April 19, 2004 Vol 1 was better. Volume 2 looked like it should have been the finale for a series. It was more like just a movie to fill in some story gaps and provide a conclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.