coltboostin Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 For the guys who said it never did 180+, or was not capable. http://videos.streetfire.net/video/71f58233-dfd8-4770-b312-983c01849fac.htm This was at 16ish psi. Low boost, lost of fuel. Got to keep it safe on the big big end. 200+ Video's cost $.25 a view. 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 And Jesus could walk on water. They're still both dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHaze Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 That's pretty fuckin fast my friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Mike, call me dude. Colt, thats fucking fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 13, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 And Jesus could walk on water. They're still both dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stangsn95gt Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 And Jesus could walk on water. They're still both dead. lol, but a fast fuckin car no doubt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maro Posted September 13, 2006 Report Share Posted September 13, 2006 Some serious balls there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EGOKILLER Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 thats just nuts jp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin R. Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Neat. Now go make something else so we can have 60 page threads. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Apex Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 You sure that wasn't kmh?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinner Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 so I take it the problems you had before have been resolved now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verse Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Neat. Now go make something else so we can have 60 page threads. He is, he's got a 2JZ 240SX coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Look at that camera shake..... Nutty bastard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteS40 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 nice, but seriously i was sitting here waiting for the front end to fly up that camara was all over. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
launchin1st Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 is it aerodymanically possible for a colt to go that fast? i wouldnt think so. i mean, driving a car designed to go that fast is one thing, but to drive a lunch box that fast is another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shields1181 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Hmm, I'd say thats pretty damn fast! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackbar00 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 So why not show the whole vid? We all know you wrecked it, so what difference does it make? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lustalbert Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 Congrats on making a redicously fast run. The camera shake was prety good, was that last number 191 or 193? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evan9381 Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 I saw 193. was that the run the crash occured on, or was it a seperate 200+ mph run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 14, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 is it aerodymanically possible for a colt to go that fast? i wouldnt think so. i mean, driving a car designed to go that fast is one thing, but to drive a lunch box that fast is another. Yes. That run was only at 16psi, so figure 420-440whp. Turned up, it just got there ALOT faster. So why not show the whole vid? We all know you wrecked it, so what difference does it make? Different day. And I just spoke with the insurance company, the suit is still pending. It's no matter really, the damages the city claimed are well within my limits of liability, but just incase.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted September 14, 2006 Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 is it aerodymanically possible for a colt to go that fast? i wouldnt think so. i mean, driving a car designed to go that fast is one thing, but to drive a lunch box that fast is another. This is why you have problems... Colt = 85mph Beater. Porsche, Ferarri, ect.. Wind tunnel tested to perform stable @ 200+ with ducting/ body shaping ect. Same reason why strapping a F-16 engine to the wright brothers plane would end in disaster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 14, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2006 This is why you have problems... Colt = 85mph Beater. Porsche, Ferarri, ect.. Wind tunnel tested to perform stable @ 200+ with ducting/ body shaping ect. Same reason why strapping a F-16 engine to the wright brothers plane would end in disaster All it needed was a ricer wing, and all would have been gravy. No ducting or 1/2 million $ supercar design involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boost-n-Juice Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 u r f'n nutz! Was it losing traction around 170ish? Good lord! You need to go to church on Sunday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted September 15, 2006 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 u r f'n nutz! Was it losing traction around 170ish? Good lord! You need to go to church on Sunday. No-accidentally hit the high boost switch, so it went super rich since I was on pump. Listen and you can hear the turbo get REAL happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlowZ06 Posted September 15, 2006 Report Share Posted September 15, 2006 Alright, I retract my previous statements. It was still ugly and gay.. but fast. Very impressive. That is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.