Linn1647545492 Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 This is will be my next HP purchase. Beck claims 50-60 rwhp increase over the ls6 intake manifold. http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/24cd1r7.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/24cd3sj.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/24cd478.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/ls1.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/47b6dc35b3127cce976389ce9ad10000001.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Looks pretty nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linn1647545492 Posted March 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Looks pretty nice! $2000 with out the TB witch is 105mm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 105mm is pretty damn big. As I see it, the right use of that intake could easily earn back the price in a few weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest powers Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Too short to NA but should work well for FI. If you tried this NA it would push your powerband up to 7-8K rpm. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin R. Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 That is fucking pimp looking. But yeah, Linn is sponsored by the city of Columbus and their 20$ bills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsey Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 With sheet metal, could heat be a problem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LSWON333 Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 I saw that thing on ls1 tech...That thing is a beast. The one Im looking at isnt close to that but aint to shabby... http://www.byunspeed.com/product_info.php?cPath=22_26_243&products_id=4148&osCsid=1c7c74dc91800d26deec75e62d0600a4 17 more hp than an ls6 at 6200 thats got to be fast 90 territory for 550 less. $440 plus $185 for an 85 mm tb until they come out with the 96 or 101 mm this summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotCarl Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 It's looks fairly high (height wise), won't there be any clearance issues? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Removed Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Too short to NA but should work well for FI. If you tried this NA it would push your powerband up to 7-8K rpm. and would just be a dog under 4k.. torque killer, but thats what the bottle is for :burn: john should look into this, his 6th gear WOT run will need this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinman Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 If you tried this NA it would push your powerband up to 7-8K rpm. Nothing wrong with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaSSon Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Nothing wrong with that Until he spins a bearing! Time for a bottom end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Nothing wrong with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linn1647545492 Posted March 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 I already spin the stock bottom end to 7k as far as fitment http://www.beckmechanical.com/images/sams1.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest powers Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 I already spin the stock bottom end to 7k 7k and 8k are a world apart. Then 8k and 9K are even further. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linn1647545492 Posted March 8, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 Im looking forward to see dyno and track results from the intake. Here are some more pics: http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/intake_2.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/intake_3.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/intake_4.jpg http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u57/playwithlinn/intake_6.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 5.7 Posted March 8, 2007 Report Share Posted March 8, 2007 I'd like to see how well it does.. I dunno for 2K though.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1647545489 Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 7k and 8k are a world apart. Then 8k and 9K are even further. Truer words haven't been spoken. I"ve done a lot of LSX valvetrain testing recently. It takes a really nice valvetrain on an LSX to keep everything together and happy at 8000 rpm let alone 9k. Trust me I've broken a lot of parts Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 Truer words haven't been spoken. I"ve done a lot of LSX valvetrain testing recently. It takes a really nice valvetrain on an LSX to keep everything together and happy at 8000 rpm let alone 9k. Trust me I've broken a lot of parts I will be getting ahold of you when I decide to try and spin mine to 10k. lol. :burn: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doug1647545489 Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 I will be getting ahold of you when I decide to try and spin mine to 10k. lol. :burn: I have a spring for you. Seriously... it's a Cup spring that would fit an LS-1 application. Good for 10,000 rpm and up to .850ish lift. Very stable. Now the other parts of your engine.... that's up to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linn1647545492 Posted March 9, 2007 Author Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 I have a spring for you. Seriously... it's a Cup spring that would fit an LS-1 application. Good for 10,000 rpm and up to .850ish lift. Very stable. Now the other parts of your engine.... that's up to you. I dont even want to ask how much it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 about $6 at Walmart, theyre on sale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koolrayz Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 I personally couldnt care less about torque loss under 4000 rpm. IMHO this intake would only be worth the money on big cubes and high rpm. waste of money on a stock cubic inch car. I made my direct port with a fast 90 intake for less than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trjackson Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 2k is very reasonable, seriously. Supra guys are spending 3K on the veilside intake manifold, now that is a tad rediculous. Nevertheless, how much more of an improvment would this be over the Fast 90? Ty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted March 9, 2007 Report Share Posted March 9, 2007 I dont even want to ask how much it is. I do. How much? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.