RX-7 Addict Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 EDIT:::: twin-turbo 3.8L V6 will produce 473 horsepower and 434 ft-lbs. of torque. 192mph top speed. 0-60 3.5 seconds, 11.7 1/4 mile STOCK. http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs1.jpg http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs2.jpg http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs3.jpg http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs4.jpg http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs6.jpg damn.. nice looking intake runners! http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs7.jpg http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/10/nissangtr_fs9.jpg Apparently its sub-$80k (z06 or 911 range) , 450+ hp, twin turbo V6, awd, and the coolest thing to come out of Japan for a long time. 190mph+ top speed. According to motortrend, the GT-R goes 0-60 of 3.5 seconds, an 11.7-second quarter mile, a 192 mph top speed, and under $80k. discuss........... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty2Hotty Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Fancy 350Z. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RX-7 Addict Posted October 16, 2007 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Fancy 350Z. bullshit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty2Hotty Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 bullshit. Just call it as I see it. I think the new camaro is a smashed up C4 vette. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Karacho1647545492 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 looks like its not a manual. piece of fucking trash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotCarl Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Just call it as I see it. I think the new camaro is a smashed up C4 vette. Maybe aesthetically but I can respect the engineering behind it. If I were in the market for an 80k performance car, I still wouldnt buy it.. sorry. Everything looks nice except the stupid looking spoiler. the body lines and rear-end would look so much better without that thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty2Hotty Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Not saying it's horrible, just looks like a fancy 350Z done up by an aftermarket company. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokey Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 very cool car. The front came out a little more hard-edged than I had hoped from the spy shots. I'm not a big fan of the ripples in front of the front wheels. I realize that they're probably useful, but it jumped out at me. Price is going to be a major player here as well. Not sure how many they intend to sell here do you know? I'd imagine they're looking for the NSX market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinner Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 and this is offically in the wrong thread. moving to pics Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Why does it have a back seat? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex1647545498 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Cool. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Beast Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 I cant put my finger on it but something is missing. The design needs an add on to flow better but I cant figure out what it is.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hotrodmama024 Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 I like it! I was looking at the 300z but i need a back seat for my little one. But still not worth $80,000. Thats corvette right there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Apex Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Meh....GTR this, GTR that. I've heard so much bullshit about this car for the past 10 years it feels like old news already and it's probably going to get smoked on the track by every car on the market within +/- $20k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Abuse Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Yay another exotic car I'll only see in magazines and movies with talentless rappers. But it's not exotic. I waited and waited and waited for the new skyline, and this is what we get? THAT is bullshit, I'll have a GTO thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Beast Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 Figured it out, The recipe called for more rice http://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i89/xxtheonlyxx/nissangtr_fs1.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major_Movit Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 I personally like it. given, im a nissan guy but still. It better be offered in a 6speed manual otherwise... ugh *edit* looks like 6 or 7 speed paddle shifting =( as for it having backseats.... the skyline(gtr, whatever) has always been a sporty family car in japan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rally Pat Posted October 16, 2007 Report Share Posted October 16, 2007 I like it to, although I agree about the 350z look. I think it looks like a 350z wrecked into an R34. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
still2hi Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 i think it looks like a design between the 350z and the lotus elise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin R. Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Automatic?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Beast Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 The majority of rich/upper class people (that can afford cars like this) must prefer automatics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallard Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Automatic?! Calm down. DSG. And Eric, why does it have to be exotic? The last one was only 'exotic' in the US. Ben, why shouldn't it have a back seat? The 911 has a back seat, the non-GTR Skyline has them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinner Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 The majority of rich/upper class people (that can afford cars like this) must prefer automatics. Lazy Americans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Beast Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Lazy Americans. We are about 15 years away from mass produced remote controlled cars and cars that drive themselves.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FooFooMaru Posted October 17, 2007 Report Share Posted October 17, 2007 Not saying it's horrible, just looks like a fancy 350Z done up by an aftermarket company. That's how I see it. Take 350z and kinda evolve it a bit and bam, stronger, faster, etc... I like it though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.