CRed05 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Launch Control Controversy Explained. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN1647545504 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 (edited) That is BS to me... S#it does not work... Snow conditions, mud... BS... Edited April 23, 2009 by ICEMAN Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorne Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 sweet. My wrx has Mud stuck mode now!!!! REV REV REV REV REV 5psi Propel from mud! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 Way to continue to make excuses for that overpriced piece of shit. Bottom line - drivetrain can't handle the power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 http://www.pbase.com/timothylauro/image/111683732/original.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhett Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 ^^^^^^^ LOL Truth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10_penn Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 for getting out of snow... wtf btw... pdggp lol @ your pic Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimTaylor751647545500 Posted April 23, 2009 Report Share Posted April 23, 2009 What a joke. Maybe concentrate more on being able to use the power you're making. Don't just put all your R&D budget into making it such a *cough* great powerful car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbird Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Pdqgp...I REALLY wish I could +rep you some more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wonderboy Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 what a pile of shit. why cant they accept that they dropped the ball big time on this one? bring back the r34 or fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aesthetic_Influx Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 I really like the car, despite all of the BS.... but I'd still rather have an R33 GTR. Kthanksbye. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbird Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 You're both wrong...R32 or BUST!!! Ok the secret ricer inside of me really likes the R34 more...oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Beard Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 anybody else think the ass end kinda resembles a cross between a older impala and a vette? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRed05 Posted April 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 (edited) anybody else think the ass end kinda resembles a cross between a older impala and a vette? Yes, but skylines have always had that 4 round tail-lights look going on. You can always tell when you are behind a skyline, has somewhat of an "afterburner" look. that mud escape mats pic is hilarious! Edited April 24, 2009 by kickass Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSXRAntwon Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Sounds like Nissan is trying to cover their ass's finally... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morabu Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 sounds like there are a bunch of haters in here for a 3.5/60 car Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10_penn Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 anybody else think the ass end kinda resembles a cross between a older impala and a vette? there's a pic on the net somewhere with a GT-R parked next to a cobalt SS with the big wing. shot was taken from the back. you'd be shocked at how similar they look... let me try to find it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgtschulze Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Nissan screwed the pooch no matter what. Who gives a $hit if a car has XXX amount of hp if the damn thing can't put the power to the ground without voiding the warranty. Anyone else catch how the engineer never answered the question about turning off the VDC as many times as the owner wants?? Imagine that. All just one big marketing scheme. Nothing more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rally Pat Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 You're both wrong...R32 or BUST!!! Ok the secret ricer inside of me really likes the R34 more...oh well. R32 FTW The R33 looks like an ugly pregnant chick, and the R34 looks like it was designed by a civic driving Mexican. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coltboostin Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Way to continue to make excuses for that overpriced piece of shit. Bottom line - drivetrain can't handle the power. There is a 7XX whp up here, with no tranny issues. The "fix" is some simple, relative inexpensive parts evidently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonneVille Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 The problem isn't the failures, the problem is that Nissan decided to try and blame an engineering problem on their customers. If Nissan had done ANYTHING to try and solve the problems for 09 buyers, they wouldn't be catching the shit they are now. Instead, they acted like a bunch weaselly little cock-whistlers. Fuck Nissan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10_penn Posted April 24, 2009 Report Share Posted April 24, 2009 Nissan = Fail.. it's just a coincidence that the "launch control" that isn't really launch control helped to make the car go faster 0-60... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 if the owners manual says to use it for a certain reason, and you use it for another reason... then you shouldnt get shit fixed. Thats like people trying to warrenty center diffs when they drove around turns in 4WL... If you buy a car with any kind of "toys" in it, you should read the manual and use the toys as listed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SPLN SUX Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Nissan = Fail.. it's just a coincidence that the "launch control" that isn't really launch control helped to make the car go faster 0-60... Well drrr... think about what it does... it effectively turns a 1600rpm stall converter into a 4500rpm stall converter... wtf did you think would happen??? It would get slower? Think McFly, think... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 sounds like there are a bunch of haters in here for a 3.5/60 car Were you really lame enough to quote 0-60 times? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.