CRed05 Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 As the Infiniti G25. Only reason I care is because it comes with a 2.5L Turbo engine. Power numbers are weaksauce but I'm sure that can be fixed. http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2010/01/2011-infiniti-g25-will-get-turbo-25-liter-at-the-2010-detroit-auto-show.html I'd take it over a G37 and probably even a 370z, but not a 2.0T A4 which makes more power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWW$HEEET Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Color me unimpressed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyM3rC Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Cool. This is a step in the right direction for them. I never like the VQ motors because they are so uninspired. Maybe this 2.5turbo will be a little better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fubar231 Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Its nice to see some boosted cars finally coming back on the market. -vdub/audi whos always had em. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Main3s Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Ugly ass car, okay preformance... I'll stick with the G35. 100x sexier and more NA power. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbird Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 I was hoping for a coupe with a QR25DET. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 As the Infiniti G25. Only reason I care is because it comes with a 2.5L Turbo engine. Power numbers are weaksauce but I'm sure that can be fixed. http://blogs.insideline.com/straightline/2010/01/2011-infiniti-g25-will-get-turbo-25-liter-at-the-2010-detroit-auto-show.html I'd take it over a G37 and probably even a 370z, but not a 2.0T A4 which makes more power. 250HP > Stock 2.0T. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 2.0T is pretty slow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boosted98gst Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 They are shitting on the SKYRINE name!! they should just bring back the RB out of the 34 and keep it a 2.5 or 2.6 340hp , newer cars are fucking weak bring back the 90's japan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Draco-REX Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 No coupe, no care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 2.0T is pretty slow. Yeah, but markedly better once you chip/TP the little sucker. You can only do so much with a K03 friendo. On a similar note, it's still way better than driving a plasti-dipped truck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Ugly ass car, okay preformance... I'll stick with the G35. 100x sexier and more NA power. FYI, its the same car, different engine. Not sure how it is ugly-er. 250HP > Stock 2.0T. They are rating the 2.5T at 210hp/195tq. The new 2.0T in the A4 is 211/258 and is MUCH faster than our 200hp 2.0Ts. You are acting like you didn't know this why? 2.0T is pretty slow. With a manual trans, the A4 can do 15 flat. Not bad for a 200hp, 3500lb AWD car. Low 14's with a chip. Not bad if you ask me. The Tiptronic sucks the life out of the engine though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 They are rating the 2.5T at 210hp/195tq. After careful re-reading I have determined that you must be mentally retarded, or can't read. I'll help. "In Japan the normally-aspirated engine is rated at 210 horsepower and 195 pound-feet of torque" "We expect the turbocharged version to be closer to 250hp" PS Still <3 you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnaplay1647545503 Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Looks just like every other sedan being put out on the market these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 After careful re-reading I have determined that you must be mentally retarded, or can't read. I'll help. "In Japan the normally-aspirated engine is rated at 210 horsepower and 195 pound-feet of torque" "We expect the turbocharged version to be closer to 250hp" PS Still <3 you. I actually didn't read the article. I read about it on TCL and aparently took someone elses word for it, who is retarded. Makes more sense now, I was wondering how the tq would be lower than hp on a modern turbo engine. Jones 1, Aaron 0 I tip my hat good sir. Faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GSXRAntwon Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 No coupe, no care. x2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimTaylor751647545500 Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 Cool. This is a step in the right direction for them. I never like the VQ motors because they are so uninspired. Maybe this 2.5turbo will be a little better. :gtfo: Nissan's VQ Engine Receives Ward's 10-Best Engines Award. The Nissan 3.5-liter VQ V6 engine has been named to the annual Ward's 10-Best Engines list for the 13th straight year by Ward's Communications, Inc. It is the only engine that has been part of the list every year the award has been presented. http://www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services/3983751-1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boosted98gst Posted January 12, 2010 Report Share Posted January 12, 2010 I actually didn't read the article. I read about it on TCL and aparently took someone elses word for it, who is retarded. Makes more sense now, I was wondering how the tq would be lower than hp on a modern turbo engine. Jones 1, Aaron 0 I tip my hat good sir. Faggot You cant see past anything not german and FWD huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 You cant see past anything not german and FWD huh? Care to explain? I misread the info, thinking that the turbo hp/tq was going to be what the N/A engine produces. Then explained that the 2.0T is decent for what it is, nothing more. ?????? I really like the G35/37. Great value, great performance, great features. But yes, I am a German car fan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Care to explain? I misread the info, thinking that the turbo hp/tq was going to be what the N/A engine produces. Then explained that the 2.0T is decent for what it is, nothing more. ?????? I really like the G35/37. Great value, great performance, great features. But yes, I am a German car fan. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boosted98gst Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Care to explain? I misread the info, thinking that the turbo hp/tq was going to be what the N/A engine produces. Then explained that the 2.0T is decent for what it is, nothing more. ?????? I really like the G35/37. Great value, great performance, great features. But yes, I am a German car fan. Oh nothing wrong with it, just every single post Ive ever seen you make either brings up a 2.0t a vw or why you should own a vw vs another car or how a vw does in a dry and snow condition's. lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZUrj_D13_Y Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Oh nothing wrong with it, just every single post Ive ever seen you make either brings up a 2.0t a vw or why you should own a vw vs another car or how a vw does in a dry and snow condition's. lol Read post 1,4,7,8 and 11. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRTurbo04 Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 Oh nothing wrong with it, just every single post Ive ever seen you make either brings up a 2.0t a vw or why you should own a vw vs another car or how a vw does in a dry and snow condition's. lol x2... didnt u know vw/audi was dipped in gold an hand built by god him self :jerkit: good looking car but yea looks the same as all the other stuff out there meh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted January 13, 2010 Report Share Posted January 13, 2010 x2... didnt u know vw/audi was dipped in gold an hand built by god him self :jerkit: good looking car but yea looks the same as all the other stuff out there meh God doesn't exist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.