Dr. Pomade Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Geez, it's a fucking movie. Jesse is spot on: if you're thinking the value of this movie is in its plot, then you're retarded. Sometimes I think some of you just need to get laid more often so you'll stop whining about stupid shit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Pomade Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 P.S. Putty, I found your original post funny/clever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Maker Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 P.S. Putty, I found your original post funny/clever. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 If I worked on that movie in anyway I would be proud, no way I could even imagine all the detail in that move. Seeing the insects made me start to itch. It was easily the most visually stunning movie I have ever seen, and I saw the first three Star Wars in a theater. Yes I think it is more visually stunning than Star Wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeppelin Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 When my oldest(17 now) was about 9-10 I think, she dug an animated film called Ferngully-The Last Rainforest. Watched it allot. Avatar reminded me of that movie. The forest they created in Avatar is straight out of a saltwater reef tank under actinic(blue) lighting. They seemed to use the physical characteristics of zoanthids and palythoa corals, as well as featherduster invertebrates. That was cool to see. HBO had a 'behind the scenes' of the making of this movie. Quite a few firsts used in the creation of both the 2D and 3D. The plot was pretty generic, yes, but the movie itself took film making to the next level for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted January 27, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 That alien chick in the movie looks hawt. Yeah, she's too hot to handle no blue. http://www.long-healthy-hair-advisor.com/image-files/very-long-hair-zoe-saldana.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paktinat Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 http://ugliesttattoos.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/129081714272179488.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC K9 Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 Plot was cliche, but visually it was amazing, and yes, the chick is hot, blue or brown, doesn't matter to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GonneVille Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 How many have you seen? 7 or 8, and they all beat you over the head with the 3D. Spaceships flying out of the screen, crap jumping at you, people thrusting stuff towards the audience, etc. Cameron skipped almost all of that, with the exception of one or two small touches. Through 99.999999999999% of the movie, it was more like watching the characters in person than seeing a movie. He didn't try to make the movie interactive, he just turned the screen into something closer to a really big stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTQ B4U Posted January 28, 2010 Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 so you didn't like the 3D effect of the movie? personally, I liked the way he did it. the cliche shit flying out and objects coming at your face are a bit corny for this level of movie. works in cartoons and kids movies, but for me, it's a bit Friday the 13th'ish to do that. We saw the IMAX 3D version and I was pretty impressed with the image quality. I knew it was going to be decent but it was better than I expected. 7 or 8, and they all beat you over the head with the 3D. Spaceships flying out of the screen, crap jumping at you, people thrusting stuff towards the audience, etc. Cameron skipped almost all of that, with the exception of one or two small touches. Through 99.999999999999% of the movie, it was more like watching the characters in person than seeing a movie. He didn't try to make the movie interactive, he just turned the screen into something closer to a really big stage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Putty Posted January 28, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2010 7 or 8, and they all beat you over the head with the 3D. Spaceships flying out of the screen, crap jumping at you, people thrusting stuff towards the audience, etc. Cameron skipped almost all of that, with the exception of one or two small touches. Through 99.999999999999% of the movie, it was more like watching the characters in person than seeing a movie. He didn't try to make the movie interactive, he just turned the screen into something closer to a really big stage. I read that wasn't his intent with the movie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.