Tshensley Posted November 15, 2012 Report Share Posted November 15, 2012 Really nice color on the mustang! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starkmaster03 Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 Nice intro, welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
03RedfireSVT Posted November 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 I just caught your intro, Tyler. Welcome to CR. We ditched the GTO for a Mustang as well. Actually I remember seeing your firebird and gto at a car show I was at right before I got rid of mine. Welcome back.. I'm in grove city as well.. little town orient.. me and lilmiller is in this area.. should all go cruise sometime Yeah I know Casey me and him are cool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKilbourne Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 Nice car. Saw the red one out a few times on Holt Rd awhile back. Are the 2.3's usually that low on torque? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kirks5oh Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 i rocked a 3.0 pulley, but had a catted midpipe, stock headers---maybe that's why i made a bit more torque?? i made 530, tq and 590 rwhp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
03RedfireSVT Posted November 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 Nice car. Saw the red one out a few times on Holt Rd awhile back. Are the 2.3's usually that low on torque? Yeah that was me lol, and ya know my best guess is since we didn't bump the timing up, and I have a stock lower and stock manifolds is why I'm so low. I honestly can't tell ya why it's like that. I'm gonna add longtubes and a 4lb lower and see where it goes from there. But I've seen several other who have same mods as me with a 3.0 upper stock lower and made similar numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
03RedfireSVT Posted November 16, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 i rocked a 3.0 pulley, but had a catted midpipe, stock headers---maybe that's why i made a bit more torque?? i made 530, tq and 590 rwhp. Stock lower pulley? Throttle body? Cold air? I'm still trying to piece together why I only made that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck531 Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 I just caught your intro, Tyler. Welcome to CR. We ditched the GTO for a Mustang as well. And how did that work out for ya? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKilbourne Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 Yeah that was me lol, and ya know my best guess is since we didn't bump the timing up, and I have a stock lower and stock manifolds is why I'm so low. I honestly can't tell ya why it's like that. I'm gonna add longtubes and a 4lb lower and see where it goes from there. But I've seen several other who have same mods as me with a 3.0 upper stock lower and made similar numbers. Switch to E85 while you are at it and the numbers would be silly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpaceGhost Posted November 16, 2012 Report Share Posted November 16, 2012 And how did that work out for ya? LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.