Jump to content

Should The GOP be using Obamacare like this?


thorne
 Share

Recommended Posts

Reviving this:

 

As the President continues to make it up as he goes, the ObamaCare disaster keeps building:

 

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304250204579433312607325596?mobile=y

 

Republicans have a chance to win back the Senate, but as you can see from the article. Obama has been unilaterally making changes to his law illegally, so it doesn't matter if they take it back or not (for the 2016, it'd be good).

 

He'll be done soon enough, unless he tries to run for that third term. Yes, I know it's illegal, but that hasn't stopped him from doing illegal things in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 409
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Reviving this:

 

As the President continues to make it up as he goes, the ObamaCare disaster keeps building:

 

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304250204579433312607325596?mobile=y

 

Republicans have a chance to win back the Senate, but as you can see from the article. Obama has been unilaterally making changes to his law illegally, so it doesn't matter if they take it back or not (for the 2016, it'd be good).

 

He'll be done soon enough, unless he tries to run for that third term. Yes, I know it's illegal, but that hasn't stopped him from doing illegal things in the past.

 

People just keep putting their heads deeper in the sand on this, even more so when it comes to his little edits.

 

This is all about 2016 and trying to stop the bleeding, because otherwise the GOP is going to run a political train on them of epic levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the GOP is going to run a political train on them of epic levels.

 

You guys still seem to be breaking this down into a dem/rep, conservative/liberal argument.

You statement should read "The government is going to run a political train on us civilians of epic levels" But then they already are and they have us focused on the rep/dem rival while they all laugh their asses off all the way to the bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys still seem to be breaking this down into a dem/rep, conservative/liberal argument.

You statement should read "The government is going to run a political train on us civilians of epic levels" But then they already are and they have us focused on the rep/dem rival while they all laugh their asses off all the way to the bank.

 

To a point, your statement is true. Most Rep/Dem in Congress thrown into a jar and shaken would appear the same removed from the jar since they flip flop on views whenever it benefits them.

 

Feinstein (California Democrat) on the NSA

For it (One month ago):

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-feinstein-nsa-foreign-policy-20140219,0,7661713.story#axzz2vhDbmCH7

Against it (Yesterday):

http://m.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/03/11/feinstein-cia-searched-intelligence-committee-computers/

 

Portman (Ohio Republican) on the Gay Marriage:

Against & For it (2011 he was against it, 2012 he was for it:

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/15/politics/portman-gay-marriage/

 

Rand Paul or Ted Cruz would be a great choice for Liberty and Freedom which you're referencing above. The issue with Cruz is since he was born in Canada, the media will not let go of if he ever got the nomination. Rand Paul being against Affirmative Action which again, the media would never let go of either if he got the nod.

 

Hillary would only dig us more into this black hole and spying game the gov't has on us. She may be worse than our current administration as well, which would be hard to beat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys still seem to be breaking this down into a dem/rep, conservative/liberal argument.

You statement should read "The government is going to run a political train on us civilians of epic levels" But then they already are and they have us focused on the rep/dem rival while they all laugh their asses off all the way to the bank.

 

Yeah, that rings home even more. I guess it comes down to what stranger is fucking you in the ass and what party they belong to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://ebonymompolitics.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/miss_me_yet.jpg

 

Want this shit fixed? Either of these are a good option.

http://media.salon.com/2012/05/ron_rand.jpg

Now people are saying "Ya know, maybe Ron Paul wasn't so nutty..."

 

Hell, even this guy would be a better option than these retards in office

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Garyjohnsonphoto_-_modified.jpg/220px-Garyjohnsonphoto_-_modified.jpg

 

"But he will legalize weed!!"

 

Would your rather have pot heads roaming around or Obamanauts?

 

Oh well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://ebonymompolitics.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/miss_me_yet.jpg

 

Want this shit fixed? Either of these are a good option.

http://media.salon.com/2012/05/ron_rand.jpg

Now people are saying "Ya know, maybe Ron Paul wasn't so nutty..."

 

Hell, even this guy would be a better option than these retards in office

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Garyjohnsonphoto_-_modified.jpg/220px-Garyjohnsonphoto_-_modified.jpg

 

"But he will legalize weed!!"

 

Would your rather have pot heads roaming around or Obamanauts?

 

Oh well

 

I approve of this post

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys still seem to be breaking this down into a dem/rep, conservative/liberal argument.

You statement should read "The government is going to run a political train on us civilians of epic levels" But then they already are and they have us focused on the rep/dem rival while they all laugh their asses off all the way to the bank.

 

http://i412.photobucket.com/albums/pp201/copperhead035/600x435_zps2b3fb998.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://ebonymompolitics.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/miss_me_yet.jpg

 

Want this shit fixed? Either of these are a good option.

http://media.salon.com/2012/05/ron_rand.jpg

Now people are saying "Ya know, maybe Ron Paul wasn't so nutty..."

 

Hell, even this guy would be a better option than these retards in office

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8d/Garyjohnsonphoto_-_modified.jpg/220px-Garyjohnsonphoto_-_modified.jpg

 

"But he will legalize weed!!"

 

Would your rather have pot heads roaming around or Obamanauts?

 

Oh well

 

Best post in this entire thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...