Jump to content

Hewlett Packard Computers are Racist


JonS

Recommended Posts

It's probably just having a problem recognizing the facial features of the his dark skin b/c it's not receiving enough light information. Most of the data in digital pictures is on the white side of the scale and not on the black side. That's why you are supposed to over expose digital pictures rather than under expose, b/c if a picture is over exposed 2 stops it can be recovered back to normal exposure w/ more info than a picture that has been under exposed by 2 stops... Did anyone follow that or are you just calling me a dork right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's probably just having a problem recognizing the facial features of the his dark skin b/c it's not receiving enough light information. Most of the data in digital pictures is on the white side of the scale and not on the black side. That's why you are supposed to over expose digital pictures rather than under expose, b/c if a picture is over exposed 2 stops it can be recovered back to normal exposure w/ more info than a picture that has been under exposed by 2 stops... Did anyone follow that or are you just calling me a dork right now?

So there is nothing wrong with the computer...it's just his fault then for being black? :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you laugh…?

Would it were that you were the intended recipient of the reply, you would have picked up on the tongue-in-cheek, oversimplified summarization directed toward the quoted elucidation of proper digital photographic technique—with emphasis on the closing remark: “Did anyone follow that or are you just calling me a dork right now?Further, the “Stick Out Tongue” smiley adds to the snub of the remark—as is conventional to do on a discussion board.

Again, these were directed toward Mr. EvilTwin, and no one else.

If, perchance, you are neither Caucasoid nor Mongoloid in descent, and happen to have misunderstood the semantics and intent therein: Please accept my humble apology, as I meant no racial disrespect.

If you happen to be an employee of Hewlett Packard or one of its subsidiaries…Or rather you are just an amateur PC Nazi: LEARN TO F*CKING CONTEXTUALIZE YOU TOMATO-EATING, COMMUNIST LEG-HUMPER!!!

Thank you, good night, and God bless America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you laugh…?

Would it were that you were the intended recipient of the reply, you would have picked up on the tongue-in-cheek, oversimplified summarization directed toward the quoted elucidation of proper digital photographic technique—with emphasis on the closing remark: “Did anyone follow that or are you just calling me a dork right now?Further, the “Stick Out Tongue” smiley adds to the snub of the remark—as is conventional to do on a discussion board.

Again, these were directed toward Mr. EvilTwin, and no one else.

If, perchance, you are neither Caucasoid nor Mongoloid in descent, and happen to have misunderstood the semantics and intent therein: Please accept my humble apology, as I meant no racial disrespect.

If you happen to be an employee of Hewlett Packard or one of its subsidiaries…Or rather you are just an amateur PC Nazi: LEARN TO F*CKING CONTEXTUALIZE YOU TOMATO-EATING, COMMUNIST LEG-HUMPER!!!

Thank you, good night, and God bless America.

Wait what? I'm confused. is someone taking something to serriously here? b/c rarely do I post a serious comment on here, esp in a thread like this. I though that everyone on here was well versed in interwebz sarcasm enough that I didn't have to utilize the [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait what? I'm confused.

Then my scheme has worked. (...followed by maniacal laughter)

is someone taking something to serriously here? b/c rarely do I post a serious comment on here, esp in a thread like this. I though that everyone on here was well versed in interwebz sarcasm enough that I didn't have to utilize the [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tool.

We're in the same boat...

Basically, I made light of your explanation...oversimplifying its content with regard to the original context of the thread. I added a two parts cynicism and a dash of naiveté...And it would appear that the irony was lost by use in such a [sarcasm] serious medium for social change [/sarcasm] (Thanks for the faux-tool by the way :cheers:)

Alternately, the retort was to be decidedly over-complicated, since the simple approach failed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...