justin0469 Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 http://www.nbcchicago.com/blogs/ward-room/The-Six-Secrets-You-Need-to-Know-From-the-Blagojevich-Filing-91848634.htmlFormer governor Rod Blagojevich's defense team asked Thursday to issue a trial subpoena to the President of the United States of America. The motion, intended to be heavily redacted, was improperly edited -- the full document was easily viewable if the text is copied and pasted to another document (an error first revealed on Capitol Fax). Below, the six revelations the redacted portions were meant to conceal.1. Obama may have lied about conversations with convicted fraudster Tony Rezko Blagojevich's lawyers allege that Rezko admitted breaking the law by contributing "a large sum of cash" to a public official. Blagojevich's attorneys say that public official is Obama. Obama said that Rezko never relayed a request from a lobbyist to hold a fundraiser in favor of favorable legislative action. But the point may be moot: regardless of Obama talking/not talking to Rezko, Blagojevich's attorneys say that Obama refused the request regardless. Redacted portion: However, the defense has a good faith belief that Mr. Rezko, President Obama’s former friend, fund-raiser, and neighbor told the FBI and the United States Attorneys a different story about President Obama. In a recent in camera proceeding, the government tendered a three paragraph letter indicating that Rezko “has stated in interviews with the government that he engaged in election law violations by personally contributing a large sum of cash to the campaign of a public official who is not Rod Blagojevich. … Further, the public official denies being aware of cash contributions to his campaign by Rezko or others and denies havingconversations with Rezko related to cash contributions. … Rezko has also stated in interviews with the government that he believed he transmitted a quid pro quo offer from a lobbyist to the public official, whereby the lobbyist would hold a fundraiser for the official in exchange for favorable official action, but that the public official rejected the offer. The public official denies any such conversation. In addition, Rezko has stated to the government that he and the public official had certain conversations about gaming legislation and administration, which the public official denies having had. Redacted footnote: The defense has a good faith belief that this public official is Barack Obama. 2. Obama may have overtly recommended Valerie Jarret for his Senate seatBlagojevich's defense team basically alleges that Obama told a certain labor union official that he (Obama) would support Valerie Jarrett's candidacy for the Senate seat. Jarrett, referred to as "Senate Candidate B", is now a senior advisor to the president. Redacted portion: Yet, despite President Obama stating that no representatives of his had any part of any deals, labor union president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to labor union official on November 3, 2008 who received a phone message from Obama that evening. After labor union official listened to the message labor union official told labor union president “I’m the one”. Labor union president took that to mean that labor union official was to be the one to deliver the message on behalf of Obama that Senate Candidate B was his pick. (Labor union president 302, February 2, 2009, p. 7). Labor union official told the FBI and the United States Attorneys “Obama expressed his belief that [senate Candidate B] would be a good Senator for the people of Illinois and would be a candidate who could win re-election. [Labor union official] advised Obama that [labor union official] would reach out to Governor Blagojevich and advocate for [senate Candidate B] ... [Labor union official] called [labor union president] and told [labor union president] that Obama was aware that [labor union official] would be reaching out to Blagojevich.” (Labor union official 302, February 3, 2009 p. 3). 3. A supporter of President Obama may have offered quid pro quo on a Jarrett senate appointmentRedacted portion: Supporter of Presidential Candidate Obama is mentioned in a phone call on November 3, 2008, having offered “fundraising” in exchange for Senate Candidate B for senator (Blagojevich Home Phone Call # 149). 4. Obama maintained a list of good Senate candidatesRedacted portion: President-elect Obama also suggested Senate Candidate A to Governor Blagojevich. John Harris told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to President’s Chief of Staff on November 12, 2008. Harris took notes of the conversation and wrote that President’s Chief had previously worked as Blagojevich's press secretary. Obama agreed of Staff told Harris that Senate Candidate A was acceptable to Obama as a senate pick. (Harris handwritten notes, OOG1004463) President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that “he could not say where but somewhere it was communicated to him that” Senate Candidate A was a suggested candidate viewed as one of the four “right” candidates “by the Obama transition team.”5. Rahm Emanuel allegedly floated Cheryl Jackson's name for the Senate seatRedacted portion: President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI that he had a conversation discussing the Senate seat with Obama on December 7, 2008 in Obama’s car. President’s Chief of Staff told the FBI “Obama expressed concern about Senate Candidate D being appointed as Senator. [President’s Chief of Staff] suggested they might need an expanded list to possibly include names of African Americans that came out of the business world. [President’s Chief of Staff] thought he suggested Senate Candidate E who was the head of the Urban League and with President’s Chief of Staff’s suggestion. 6. Obama had a secret phone call with BlagojevichRedacted portion: President-elect Obama also spoke to Governor Blagojevich on December 1, 2008 in Philadelphia. On Harris Cell Phone Call # 139, John Harris and Governor’s legal counsel discuss a conversation Blagojevich had with President-elect Obama. The government claims a conspiracy existed from October 22, 2008 continuing through December 9, 2008.6 That conversation is relevant to the defense of the government’s theory of an ongoing conspiracy. Only Rod Blagojevich and President Obama can testify to the contents of that conversation. The defense is allowed to present evidence that corroborates the defendant’s testimony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 Bush's fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhallam85 Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 Bush's fault.Nope. Your moms fault Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarvismb Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 Nope. Your moms faultdamn, if that's true, Zach's mom really fucked up... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disclaimer Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 F*(k you Zach, I didn't vote for your mom. Make her take it back! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 This thread was easily derailed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhallam85 Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 This thread was easily derailed.Yep. Its all because you started the derail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zach Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 Yep. Its all because you started the derail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhallam85 Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 np. Didnt think you would know that. Just trying to help! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likwid Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 ROFLMAO did anyone else notice how they got this info?Whoever posted the PDF just highlighted over text, apparantly all you had to do was copy and paste from the document... LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad324 Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 so to an out of the loop person like myself....exactly what does this mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likwid Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 so to an out of the loop person like myself....exactly what does this mean?It's like trying to correct a word document by putting whiteout on your monitor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 ROFLMAO did anyone else notice how they got this info?Whoever posted the PDF just highlighted over text, apparantly all you had to do was copy and paste from the document... LOLthat reminds me of that pedo they caught who used photoshop swirl to obscure his face in photos. after months of investigating, some guy at interpol's kid must have showed them how photoshop worked, and they just unswirled him, identified him and arrested him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad324 Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 It's like trying to correct a word document by putting whiteout on your monitor.so what effect is discovery going to have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Likwid Posted April 26, 2010 Report Share Posted April 26, 2010 that reminds me of that pedo they caught who used photoshop swirl to obscure his face in photos. after months of investigating, some guy at interpol's kid must have showed them how photoshop worked, and they just unswirled him, identified him and arrested him.I remember that, lolso what effect is discovery going to have?I'd say nothing, other than a lot of embarrassment. Although I suppose someone could move for a mistrial... but the revelation of confidential materials doesn't change the basis... right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.