RSVDon Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I don't like what's going on up front, but that rear is to die for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I'll take "what happens when a ricer gets ahold of a Vette" for $200. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSVDon Posted October 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I'll take "what happens when a ricer gets ahold of a Vette" for $200.You think that's rice? WTF? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I think it looks horrible. Sorry. Stock looks much nicer, cleaner. Just my opinion though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSVDon Posted October 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 Lol it's an identical look except for larger fenders. But anyways, fix whatever it is that doesn't allow me to enlarge pictures using Google Chrome and Highslide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
max power Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I'd hit it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casper Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 Lol it's an identical look except for larger fenders. But anyways, fix whatever it is that doesn't allow me to enlarge pictures using Google Chrome and Highslide. It looks like added non-functional plastic.Chrome sucks sometimes unfortunately. It'll work one of these days. It's beta still isn't it? I tried using it, but so many sites just don't work with it fully yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Butters Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 love it...the whole car, front and backmaybe the first widebody car ive ever liked 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Butters Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 except...not sure on those ducts in the front, now that i look again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSVDon Posted October 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 It looks like added non-functional plastic.Chrome sucks sometimes unfortunately. It'll work one of these days. It's beta still isn't it? I tried using it, but so many sites just don't work with it fully yet.You talking about the lower flat panels? Those are carbon fiber ducts that control airflow along the car including just before the wheels. That's factory stuff.I'm using whatever this download link is for. Didn't think it was Beta?? http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/landing_chrome_mac.html?hl=en Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Butters Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 these are the ones i was talking about.... i dont like how theyre raised out from the car, just look outta place...if they were sunk in they wouldnt be as bad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alienpi Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 It looks like added non-functional plastic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cypress Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I'd giggidy-giggidy-goo all over that "non-functional plastic". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natedogg624 Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 it'd be better if the wide body served a purposesuch as more room for twin turbo chargers... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbot Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 smoked tail lamps? sorry, might as well be "altezzas". it's not a pontiac grand am.otherwise, i think it looks pretty gangsta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad324 Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 it'd be better if the wide body served a purposeunless I'm wrong its for wider tires which = better traction. I'm guessing aerodynamics might play a small part but I could easily be full of shit on that one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jblosser Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 ...But anyways, fix whatever it is that doesn't allow me to enlarge pictures using Google Chrome and Highslide. ...I'm using whatever this download link is for. Didn't think it was Beta?? http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/landing_chrome_mac.html?hl=enAny AdBlocker running? Disable it for ORdN. That's what fixed the Highslide JS/pics issue in Chrome for me.But you're on a Mac - just use Safari? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeNko Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 That is one sexy ass vette. I'd rock that bitch just the way it sits...Sorry Ben not seeing the rice element.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimbrandt Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 WOW.... thats friggn gorgeous!!!!!!! Im not one for wide body kits n such, but that is one sick vette. think I need a smoke.................. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chevysoldier Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I like it. I'd definitely own one.Any AdBlocker running? Disable it for ORdN. That's what fixed the Highslide JS/pics issue in Chrome for me.But you're on a Mac - just use Safari?That's what fixed the issue for me too. I'm using the beta version and not running into many problems with it. Used to be some problems but I see them getting fixed. More and more sites are working with chrome now too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
obesityrules Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I am willing to bet that all that extra plastic and sheet metal actually decreased the performance. road and track was just bitching last month about how wide the stock vette was and how it took the fun out of driving it on country roads because of the width. i would be pissed if i was riding down south and seen that behemoth the op posted coming through a turn taking up 3/4 the road... fuckn rice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sen10nalz Posted October 16, 2010 Report Share Posted October 16, 2010 I am willing to bet that all that extra plastic and sheet metal actually decreased the performance. road and track was just bitching last month about how wide the stock vette was and how it took the fun out of driving it on country roads because of the width. i would be pissed if i was riding down south and seen that behemoth the op posted coming through a turn taking up 3/4 the road... fuckn riceI don't see how a widebody is associated to ricers?Ricers to me are are the white/mexican/asian/somolian kids that primer their car, lower it, throw an exhaust and air filter (all autozone) parts and think it will out race every other car on the road.. IMO: the widebody looks nice, definately not feeling the side air dams. But for the money that's already being charged on it.. id personally just leave it stock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swingset Posted October 20, 2010 Report Share Posted October 20, 2010 Looks trashy to me, I much prefer the Callaway treatment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moto-Brian Posted October 20, 2010 Report Share Posted October 20, 2010 I think it looks horrible. Sorry. Stock looks much nicer, cleaner. Just my opinion though.Stock looks like it needs a mullet for the complete setup. The above pics are badass and looks like a Vette should if considering a supercar type machine. I think it looks very Lotus like except a little longer and wider.Rice... Good one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moto-Brian Posted October 20, 2010 Report Share Posted October 20, 2010 Looks trashy to me, I much prefer the Callaway treatment.That looks like a kit car vs. a supercar. It reminds me of the Pontiac Fiero kits... The gaps on the dorrs and hood, etc are shit. The Vette in question is amazing detail and very mean looking.Anyone that has seen the LeMans cars has to agree (If you think they are badass).Uploaded with ImageShack.usThe wide kits are typically for the rear end and front to accomodate upgraded suspension components and wheels/tires for performance. As for the comment that it takes away from performance based on weight, I am willing to bet large sums of money that if the guy did that kind of work, it ain't stock... Power is probably not an issue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.