Jump to content

Opinions on this fatality


Fazerlady

Recommended Posts

This is exactly why I am all for a helmet law!

While I feel extremely sorry for the family of the guy who died, I think it is not right that the driver of the vehicle is charged with vehicular homicide! I do agree with the charges of the DUI.

After all the riders decision to not wear a helmet probably contributed to him passing away due to severe headtrauma. So ultimately this changed the charge from assault (or whatever it would have been had he got hurt if he had worn a helmet) to homicide.

http://www.daytondailynews.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/dayton/daytoncourts/entries/2011/07/19/woman_who_struck_motorcyclist.html

I just think that we all have the responsibility to protect ourselves.

Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were driving drunk and killed somebody. It doesnt matter if they were wearing a helmet or not. She broke a law and killed somebody in the process.

+1

Would he have died if she wasn't on the road drunk? No! So it stands to charge her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand what you are saying.

I guess what I am looking at, is the severity could have been prevented.

- Yes, if she would have not been drinking, this probably would not have happened.

- Yes, if he would have worn a helmet, he probably would not be dead and it would not be homicide.

If everybody would take responsibility for their lifes, all of this could be prevented.

I don't get why there is a seatbelt law, but not a helmet law. It makes NO sense to me. They are both meant to prevent the severity of injuries in case of an accident!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pose an interesting question. The act didn't change, but the outcome was different because of the lack of helmet. No, helmets should not be mandated. We need to retain the right to make bad decisions in our own lives. This is akin to mandating Kevlar vests while shopping at crack-kroger on East Main St. You get shot and murder/assault is decided by what you did or didn't wear. Admittedly (makes me an awful person, I'm sure), I find myself feeling much less sorry for a death caused by an accident in which the rider wasn't wearing a helmet. . "No" to a mandate though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You pose an interesting question. The act didn't change, but the outcome was different because of the lack of helmet. No, helmets should not be mandated. We need to retain the right to make bad decisions in our own lives. This is akin to mandating Kevlar vests while shopping at crack-kroger on East Main St. You get shot and murder/assault is decided by what you did or didn't wear. Admittedly (makes me an awful person, I'm sure), I find myself feeling much less sorry for a death caused by an accident in which the rider wasn't wearing a helmet. . "No" to a mandate though.

Unless you're psychic, you don't know that. He could've very well died even wearing a helmet. It's kinda like shooting someone. They may or may not die. They die, you're charged with homicide. They live, assault with a deadly weapon (and probably other charges as well). Either way, either charge, you committed the crime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you're psychic, you don't know that. He could've very well died even wearing a helmet. It's kinda like shooting someone. They may or may not die. They die, you're charged with homicide. They live, assault with a deadly weapon (and probably other charges as well). Either way, either charge, you committed the crime.

Agree 100%. I was attempting to recap her point. His lack of a helmet should not change her crime. You drive drunk, don't be surprised by the penalties. Society hasn't been keeping them a secret for the past 30 years.

Edit... I am not driving tonight for a reason, hence my failure to make my point.

Edited by C-bus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know I consider myself a safe driver/rider.

But to think that I could make a mistake in traffic, which I am sure everyone has done here, and by some freak possibility I happen to hit a rider that dies b/c he decided not to protect himself as much as he can, scares me.

So are you saying I could go to prison for homicide if the person dies instead of invol manslaughter, or even a much lesser charge if the guy "only' gets injured because he chose to be smart and protect himself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know I consider myself a safe driver/rider.

But to think that I could make a mistake in traffic, which I am sure everyone has done here, and by some freak possibility I happen to hit a rider that dies b/c he decided not to protect himself as much as he can, scares me.

So are you saying I could go to prison for homicide if the person dies instead of invol manslaughter, or even a much lesser charge if the guy "only' gets injured because he chose to be smart and protect himself?

If you're drunk, yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it is not right that the driver of the vehicle is charged with vehicular homicide! I do agree with the charges of the DUI.

Seriously? What if I was drinking and driving and drove over your kid on his bicycle.

Well he wasn't wearin' his helmet, so just give me a ticket for DUI!!!

NO :nono:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our justice system punishes the intent, not the result. If someone dies as a result of a simple accident then you are not charged. If someone dies as a result of you breaking the law, then you are.

I understand why the OP asked this question and I think it's a valid question to ask... however... It sets a dangerous precedent to shift blame onto an otherwise blameless victim on the basis that they did not go far enough to protect themselves. The problem is; who decides what is "far enough"?

Does the DUI driver get a free pass if the ride was not wearing a jacket? Or pants? OR maybe he or she was wearing a jacket but not an *armored* jacket. Or maybe they should have been wearing a back protector? Heck, bikes are dangerous regardless of how much gear you wear, so should the DUI driver should get a fee pass simply because she hit a bike.

"If he was wearing a helmet he may not have died" = "If he was in a car he may not have died"

If the rider was complying with the law on how much gear to wear then the DUI driver is being charged appropriately.

That said, my favorite helmet-related quote is still; "Anyone who does not ear a helmet obviously has nothing up there worth protecting." Gear up folks, ATGATT. When you're looking down from heaven (or up from hell - I know you guys) then it will be of little consolation that your lack of helmet didn't prevent the DUI driver that killed you from being charged.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with everyone else posting here. Does anyone else remember a couple years back when a kid on a 1000 with a helmet on was doing around 80-90mph down Park Ave in Mansfield & hit a car that was turning out from a side street?? I know the last I read about it they were trying to charge the car with pulling out in front even though the dude was doing way over the limit.. like wtf?? Hopefully the cager got everything dropped from that case..

Edited by bchristy07
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...