I don't generally find fault with anyone else's prepping, but IP's post matches my philosophy almost to a Tee. I'm prepared for a couple weeks' worth of services disruption and isolated civil unrest, but I'd never be able to fend off a large-scale mob attack or governmental take-over of my property or person without spending my entire savings on an impenetrable bunker, and that's just not worth it to me. I'd rather spend the mental, emotional, creative, time and monetary investments towards things far more likely to occur, like my kiddo going to college, possibly losing my job or changing careers, having to pay for age-related or accident-related healthcare, retirement, replacement of a vehicle, etc. So I guess the only thing I'd find fault with anyone's prepping, is if they're sacrificing their fundamentals to asymmetrically prepare for less likely events.