I figured you posted it, I was trying to make a point.
Let's look at this from a logical point instead of an emotional point (we should crush it to punish him, we shouldn't crush it because of what it is). Like pdqgp pointed it, California is in pretty bad shape finincially right now. How logical is it for the goverment to say 'We are going to take X thing from you because you did Y thing wrong and crush it to make you feel bad... even though that thing would fetch 1-1.5 million dollars at an auction' That's not very smart to crush it over some feelings right? California is talking about (or already has?) give teachers IOU's and we are going to crush a 1 million+ dollar car.
There aren't very many people that would not feel the financial aspect of someone taking their 1.5 million dollar car. If it doesn't matter financially to him, we can't say for sure that he would have an emotional attachment to the car.
So take the guys car and sell it, as a 'tax'. This is the rolling scale. You do this laundry list of things in your car that greatly endanger others lives and show no respect to the safety of others on the road and we take them and we don't crush them, but we sell them. During some time period you get a work privilege only licenses, they have to drive a gremlin and aren't allowed to rebuy the car that was taken from them (whether that exact car from auction or another like it). Then maybe something else, I'm not sure. I haven't put a ton of thought into this except for that.