That's my point of this thread...
I find, as I get older, that a happy shadetree-mechanic life is to have 1-2 vehicles within spitting distance of a warranty/active OEM support, and the rest of the cars can be as simple as possible FOR WHAT THEY ARE DESIGNED TO DO.
http://jalopnik.com/driving-this-jdm-honda-civic-type-r-was-as-perfect-as-i-1789197385
No one - including myself, Not Brian and others on CR having owned them - will deny that Honda hatchbacks of the 90s were fun at a time when they were still socially acceptable to own. Even in an era before internet shopping was mainstream, you could buy hop-up parts for super-cheap out of catalogs and have a fun, simple, reliable platform for not much maintenance$$$.
Now, society seems to dictate that simple is unsafe, and for the less-intelligent. I see marketing dictate that we constantly get NEW NEW NEW and I find that's the path for the TRUE ignoramuses: pay far more than you need to for what social media or a commercial say you should own and love.
When I see car-enthusiasts keeping 1990s cars in great working order - especially at CC&C - I feel far more connected to those vehicles than modern cars claim they can offer.
There are a few options that still give me hope for the future of fun used cars RWD platforms like BMWs/FRS/BRZ, Fiesta ST, trucks, ponycars like the Mustang/Camaro/Challenger/Corvette. Like reports of the manual transmission dying off, there will always be a few cars that keep simple driving alive, well-supported by the aftermarket. Those will be my choice in the future.