Once again I'll reiterate, there is NO benefit rate wise to take out a 20 year mortgage over a 30 year mortgage, SO I'm going to take out a 30 year mortgage, and 99% of the time pay the amount a 15/20 year mortgage would be, with that excess going principal, but having the freedom that if something comes up one month and I can't make that extra payment, being able to still cover my mortgage fine.
Understand?
I'll have $20k equity immediately I would think, as I'm putting down close to $30k and paying about $15k under value. But who knows.
And bill, I didn't mean to come across mean, but you agree that you were clueless as to the way the housing market/mortgage business worked and obviously you got taken somewhat, as do millions of americans and that's what puts us in the epidemic.
My question to you is, if you hadn't gotten divorced, and you still owned the same home you back 4-5 years ago, where would you stand? Wouldn't you have some equity, wouldn't you be glad to own your home, etc? My point is, no one can plan for the future entirely, you had no clue you'd get divorced, causing you to have to sell the house, causing you to lose money after a few years, ETC ETC, it never ends.
And pdgpd or something, I'm currently debt free, have some investments and have money saved, I don't understand how me taking a 30 year mortgage is bad, or that you know if I will/won't prepay on the mortgage. As I've said, there is no rate benefit to me doing a 20yr loan over a 30yr. Its all the same if I do the 20 year, or do the 30 year and make the 20yr payments, so why not give myself that cushion, as you say?