r1crusher

There's an AMB below Brian. Don't know if that will work for you, but the seller is a good guy. http://www.ohioriders.net/showthread.php?t=84480

VZW + 4G = Win AT&T + HSPA+ = Fail Summary complete.

Com'on Keith! You're so smooooooth! I know you have some pull!

My speedtest.net to Washington, DC scores for VZW 3G (only two bars at moment) are ping:173ms Down:469kbps Up:403kbps

Ben, if you want to make this an apples to apples test everyone should use the same test site and choose the same test locations. Speedtest.net has apps for both Apple and Androids I think, pick a location and gather the results.

Uuumm...it has a 4.3" screen. If I'm not mistaken so does all of the "X" models.

I have a coworker who's a tech junkie. He has a 4G service with VZW and he can pull almost 60Mbps down and 20Mbps up. It is truly more than 2x as fast as my TWC speeds.

This should answer the questions above: "Android 2.3 Gingerbread comes pre-installed on the Droid Razr, but representatives told Ars that the phone will be able to upgrade to Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich, which is launching later tonight. Preorders for the Droid Razr will begin October 27, with the handset launching in November priced at $299 for 32GB of storage." That's this year as I read it Ben.

I wonder how all those Bionic owners are going to feel with this being released so soon after.

Price tag is $299 w/ 2 year contract and is expected to be available for order only with VZW on Nov.

I like it so far, discuss.... Motorola DROID RAZR

Maybe Todd could send an email to all the registered users on MS and put in a link to the thread and/or petition.

I think there are pic of said violation floating around the interwebz somewhere.

Of course they do, I was being sarcastic. I agree with everything you have said, IP. But, I honestly believe that there would be a greatly reduced chance of this sort of thing happening (and by thing I mean the parents entertaining the idea of giving their child hormone blocking drugs because of something they said at age 3) in a traditional household. That's the point I'm trying to make. And that's why I said that alternative couples should not be allowed to have children. I believe that alternative life styles are choices. Subjecting an impressionable child to those choices can potentially cause them irreputable damage in their later life. Your physical being is what you have not because of a choice, but because of nature.

I guess I have no idea either.

So the '08 is going to stay a street bike next year?

IP, a child's impression from an abusive relationship regardless of it being straight or alternative is bad, period. Let me ask you this. Do you think that this boy would be in this situation if he were in a straight household?

Sorry to have dragged you kicking and screaming to the thread you posted in. But, thanks for the reply in all seriousness. I would agree that doing the ethical and moral thing would be the right thing to do. But the simple fact that the parents are in an unnatural relationship breaks the morality thing from the go. I'd love to see a study of gays and lesbians with children which looks at how the parents relationship effects that of the children. I think that it would show that those children would follow the behaviors set by their parents and look for an alternative life style. I still stand my my statement though, sorry.

So the issue was seals and not rings?

We as motorcycle riders get grouped all the time because of the type of bike we ride. It's okay to be grouped but not to group? I know one bad apple should not spoil the bunch, but if you don't pull out that apple it will eventually spoil the rest. So you don't care that this "couple" is causing their child both physical and mental abuse? I just want to understand your side is all.

So you are saying that M-M and F-F relationships are natural and okay?

...yup, that's right. All so their son can decide if he wants to be a girl. Controversial Therapy for Pre-Teen Transgender Patient Raises Questions I usually try to stay out of shit like this but com'on. I thought gay couples would not push their views or lifestyles on others, especially children. At least that's how it has been. Now, here's a lesbo couple keeping their son from becoming just that all because at 3 years old he said he was a girl. HE'S 3 YEARS OLD! DOES HE REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING!?!? I highly suspect seeing his parents as two females that he drew something from that. If you wanna be gay, so be it. But after this I think gay couples should not be able to have kids. You're born with what you have and that should be enough to define if you're a male or female....period. Flame away.

Sweet...good to see you cross posted on MS as well.