Todd#43

I think as adults we can all infer what the intent was, even if the "word" (or part of it) isn't used, and I'm sure most people aren't offended either. If they were, I'm sure they're long gone from here. Either way, some of us do have young children that occasionally pop in and read over our shoulders. It would be nice to have the "option" to have those things "off" or "on" as the case may be.

Personally, I don't mind the swearing. I'm sure I do it just as much (ok, sometimes more) than others. I think though, that people should have the option to censor the naughty words from what they read, IF they choose. The same thing should go for some of the more "risque" emoticons.

No problem. I've I get desperate, I'll let you know

I'll keep that in mind. I'm kinda lazy though, so I'd really like to sell it all in one shot.

PMs Sent guys. I'll go ahead and put it up here too. The presses seem to be going on Ebay for around $100.00. Dies, $40-$50 per set. Same for the powder measure and tumbler - $40-$50 each. To buy all the stuff new, you'd probably have about $600 in it. I'll sell the whole lot for $350.00 Todd

Post Cop strikes again.

PM sent.

I've got a bunch of reloading equipment that I haven't used in years. I'd like to sell it as a lot, rather than bits and pieces, but you never know. Make me an offer on the whole thing, and we'll go from there: RCBS Single Stage Press with Primer Loader Hornady Powder charger with two barrels Lee 45 ACP Dies Lee 44 Mag Dies (never used) RCBS 9mm Die Set (de-primer die is missing) Lyman Powder Scale Lyman Turbo 600 Tumbler Lee Hand Primer 1.5 Boxes .45 ACP LRN Bullets

No problem. Good Luck

The shims all being the same really doesnt have much to do with it being done "recently" or not. Its possible the PO had the seats cut and put new valves in. Unless you have the information, its really impossible to guess. I'd say put them at .0065, if thats the best you can do. .0005 over isnt bad, but you dont really want to go way overboard.

I thought maybe you couldn't be in the "club" without a scooter.

Too tight is bad, looser is better. I would say get it as close to the max as you can, without going over. Really, you're not THAT far out now, and the bikes got 45K on the clock. How long since its last valve adjustment?

Then show some love, brother...gimme some + rep Dude, if you knew me you'd be calling me the "funniest mufucker I know". Ummmmm......yeah....ok......thats not too ghey.

Ok, comrade, I'm going to type real slow so that you can read this. You're assuming that EVERYONE that is taken off the welfare roll is going to end up in prison. Are YOU suggesting that every poor person is a theif, rapist, or worse? I don't believe that if you took 100 people off public assistance that you'd have anywhere close to 100 ending up in prison. At any rate, if TWO of those people don't end up in the pokey, and I have 1 person to watch them, I'm still money ahead (I'm only paying for 99 people at that point instead of 100). Get it? Your first link in that post is an article from a brit that has absolutely NO numbers to show that prison costs exceed welfare costs. The only thing remotely relevant is that as welfare spending increases, so does the prison population. Your second link is a pdf from ODJFS. An interesting paragraph: "The department’s State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2006 budget of more than $17.1 billion represents the largest budget of any “State of Ohio” agency. About 62 percent of funding comes from the federal government." It seems to say that in Ohio we spend MORE on welfare than we do on prisons. You're 0 for 2. Show me some numbers that clearly illustrate your point that "welfare is cheaper than prison"

Has nothing to do with you agreeing with me or not. It has everything to do with your continued insistence that the government knows best when it comes to spending your money. This isn't the first time you've espoused socialist leanings. I'm still waiting for you to prove that welfare costs less than prison. So far I've seen plenty of numbers. None of them from you.

I'd hardly call it a debate, and It wasn't meant to be a joke. Seriously, why dont you pack up your act and take it on the road? China? Cuba? Russia? Heyyyyyy....I know....that Chavez guy in Venezuela could probably use a guy like you. He's all about the government running everything.

I suppose it must be. Unless, of course, I use Jrmiiiiiiiii math, then it would only be a 1/8 moon. Although, under his system the government would HAVE to give me the 1/4 moon that I'm missing, because they'd be collecting all the "extra" moonage that people have (even if they've worked hard to get it). Anyway....+1 for you, sir

Good luck with that JR stuff. I'm missing half my right ass cheek thanks to them.

Wow...I'm disappointed. I thought this thread was going to be about Nick getting set of one piece leathers

Actually, its "Where have you received your indoctrination, comrade" But you got it...

Где вы получили ваше ознакомление, камрада?

If it says that .008 is acceptable, .0005 too high isn't really that much. I'd probably try to get as close to the max as you can.

We covered this already. I didn't assume that all poor parents are bad parents, although the DO perpetuate the dependency class. Who are these "better informed people" you speak of? Are they the same ones that "didn't know AIG was going to be paying hundreds of millions of dollars in bonuses? Thats statement says a lot. (emphasis added)