ChevyMan1972 Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 Guy's Check this out graemlins/burnout02.gif http://www.overboost.com/story.asp?id=1297 Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 They run one of our transaxle parts in that turd. smile.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest stvbreal Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 What the hell is a wheelie bar doing on a front wheel drive car? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
excell Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 Originally posted by EvilEvo: What the hell is a wheelie bar doing on a front wheel drive car? I hope you're not serious. graemlins/nonono.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 There are local "street" cars (it's a stretch to call any 7 second car a street car, but if it has been driven on the street and is "legal" to do so..... )that run faster than that all-out race car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave1647545494 Posted August 30, 2004 Report Share Posted August 30, 2004 not running a 2.2 ecotec there isn't thats fucking bad ass. srt-4 is right up there too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Maker Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 Originally posted by Nitrousbird: There are local "street" cars (it's a stretch to call any 7 second car a street car, but if it has been driven on the street and is "legal" to do so..... )that run faster than that all-out race car.You're bashing a car that ran a 7.594 at 189. In a FWD car to boot, traction issues cause many, many more problems. You are the definition of stupid. [ 31. August 2004, 11:08 AM: Message edited by: Neo ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest domestic_disturbance Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 thats pretty damn fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verse Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 Originally posted by Neo: Your bashing a car that ran a 7.594 at 189. In a FWD car to boot, traction issues cause many, many more problems. You are the definition of stupid. He's just mad that a 'slow 4 cylinder' is faster than he'll ever be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkendubber Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 Originally posted by Neo: You're bashing a car that ran a 7.594 at 189. In a FWD car to boot, traction issues cause many, many more problems. You are the definition of stupid.its cause it makes him feel like his penis is bigger than it is. Thats pretty bad ass, too bad its a chevy tongue.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodRed Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 I know the SRT-4's are still running on the stock 2.4L block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cougar1647545494 Posted August 31, 2004 Report Share Posted August 31, 2004 OMG, J-bodies Rul!!!111 Nah, that's pretty impressive. That's a strong little motor, those ecotecs, the only thing is every cavi owner acts like they're the shit cuz one guy got one to run that time, kinda like SOME of the honda boys, no offense Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitrousbird Posted September 1, 2004 Report Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by Neo: You're bashing a car that ran a 7.594 at 189. In a FWD car to boot, traction issues cause many, many more problems. You are the definition of stupid. Like I don't know the traction issues with FWD = why it is a poor platform to race with. But people are making this out to be the best thing since sliced bread, when there have been a number of street class cars running faster than this for years. I mean, if you are going to nut over this, should I show a link to every Pro Stock car in the series this season??? Originally posted by Jon: He's just mad that a 'slow 4 cylinder' is faster than he'll ever be.I wouldn't want my car to run that quick. I want a car I can enjoy on the street. That's a trailer-only race car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trouble Maker Posted September 1, 2004 Report Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by Nitrousbird: But people are making this out to be the best thing since sliced bread, when there have been a number of street class cars running faster than this for years. I mean, if you are going to nut over this, should I show a link to every Pro Stock car in the series this season???No, I think it's cool they broke a record and they are obviously innovating. Every car has to work within its class rules. Does that mean that these cars, or a pro stock car, are slow because there are rail cars that run 4's? No. I'm not going to whine to you about displacement or FWD, because it would just that, whining, and you know why these cars run what they do and not faster. I just think it's cool to see records broken and innovation, where ever it may be. To downgrade this because X class does the same times this does, but you feel it better, for whatever reason, is kind of silly. I also think it’s cool that they can even figure out how to get enough traction out of any FWD car to run that quick of an ET, it’s pretty crazy if you think about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulo Posted September 1, 2004 Report Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by Ricochet: I've seen built n/a Civics run 10'shttp://www.columbusracing.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=002644#000001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunkendubber Posted September 1, 2004 Report Share Posted September 1, 2004 Originally posted by Nitrousbird: Originally posted by Neo: [qb]You're bashing a car that ran a 7.594 at 189. In a FWD car to boot, traction issues cause many, many more problems. You are the definition of stupid. Like I don't know the traction issues with FWD = why it is a poor platform to race with. But people are making this out to be the best thing since sliced bread, when there have been a number of street class cars running faster than this for years. I mean, if you are going to nut over this, should I show a link to every Pro Stock car in the series this season??? You are right 4 posts, 3 members totallying 35 words and one article sure does sound like EVERYONE is on this cars cock you better be a douchebag so you can make yourself cool again. it still fulfills one of your requirements for cool since it is drag racing but i guess your need to piss people off instead of being decent over powers you. Hell this was even a domestic car at least make fun of the imports for losing at their own game or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akula Posted September 1, 2004 Report Share Posted September 1, 2004 Wow, FWD running 7.50s. That is amazing. Hats off to whomever put all that work into a car that can flat out fly! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.