Buck531 Posted July 26, 2007 Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 Here's my dyno sheet from May. http://bucky.kicks-ass.net/car/dyno/may07dyno.jpg I think with a little more tuning I'd hit the magical 300 whp mark. We'll see. http://bucky.kicks-ass.net/car/dyno/may07.jpg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sam1647545489 Posted July 26, 2007 Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 Here's my dyno sheet from May. http://bucky.kicks-ass.net/car/dyno/may07dyno.jpg I think with a little more tuning I'd hit the magical 300 whp mark. We'll see. http://bucky.kicks-ass.net/car/dyno/may07.jpg Nice work on it. I thought you told me that you were doin you own tuning which if you are looks like you got it mastered pretty good. A/F looks nice.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck531 Posted July 26, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2007 That was before I got my tuner. That was a pcm tune that was sort of off the shelf sent to me from Minnesota. I have yet to go back to the dyno with the tune I have on it now.. I'd probably be dissappointed if I did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caseyctsv Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Nice numbers. Easy to see why it 60s so well! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Not worried about it running 14.5ish A/F for those 800 RPMs that it's in boost? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck531 Posted July 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 nope. it's supposed to be like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Jones Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Congrats Bucky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bam Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Nice numbers man, good luck with reaching 300whp, i know those last few are always stragglers, lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongoose Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 That torque curve does look really nice, power seems to stay pretty strong in the upper rpm's too, good stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buckeye1647545503 Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Not bad for a stock luminia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorne Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 NICE POWER BAND. Why are you so lean for the first 800 rpms of boost? I seen you said thats how you want it but I'm curious why? What kinda timing you runnin up top? Congrats 40 more hp then the monte used to make. Not bad for a 4dr grandpa car as the ricers called it that day you clicked of the 13. Was great his 15 sec tegra makin fun of ur car till his mouth hit the floor. I miss my l67 sometimes. Specially when i see your tq curve. Was that on a 3.2 pulley or 3.0? Your not intercooled yet are you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck531 Posted July 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 That was on a 3.1 with pump gas and a little knock. I did put down like 276 or so with no knock and a 3.2. I'm not sure why it's lean for that 800 or so RPM's. I think it's Brians dyno. or the version of the software. Here's the scan from the IPS dyno day. http://bucky.kicks-ass.net/car/dyno/ipsdyno.jpg However, IPS started the dyno at what.. 4300 RPM'? brian started their dyno at 3200. shrug. I have injectors on the way. The stockers I have now are going static. This "should" allow me to run a 3.0 pulley (maybe) with some race gas and we'll see how the turd does at Norwalk in September. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bam Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 T This "should" allow me to run a 3.0 pulley (maybe) with some race gas and we'll see how the turd does at Norwalk in September. Sweeeeet, 12's or bust right? Same for me, what'd you trap at the last norwalk? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck531 Posted July 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Last year at norwalk.. 104ish. This year.. whopping 100-101. (after the cam ). It's running too fat in 3rd gear and falling on it's ass. I need to borrow a wide band, but I'm going to guess I'm running 10:1 or so in 3rd . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miller Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 Go buck, I miss trying to make my 3800 quick, fun car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rl Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 If it was with a tail pipe sniffer there is a delay, thats why it appears to be that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck531 Posted July 27, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 If it was with a tail pipe sniffer there is a delay, thats why it appears to be that way. Yep. it was shoved into the location where the cutout is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bam Posted July 27, 2007 Report Share Posted July 27, 2007 buck, i'm gunning for you at norwalk, you've got a solid car with good numbers, I want mid-high twelve's on spray or low low 13's off spray, just watch your rear view. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.