2pointslow Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 A member on a different forum posted a poll and i found it very interesting. Wanted to see what the collective opinion of cr was. Well what do you think? Should people who receive welfare be forced to undergo mandatory sterilization? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gergwheel1647545492 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 i think if you have been on welfare for more than 5 years you should, if you are just going through a temporary rough spell then no, but if you don't plan on ever getting a decent job then yes you should. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orion Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 My knee jerk reaction would be that I would accept some sort of temporary, reversable measure, and even that is something I might change my opion on given more time to think about it. I would never accept or vote for a permanent measure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeffro Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 No, but drug tests should be mandatory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2pointslow Posted September 18, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 i think if you have been on welfare for more than 5 years you should, if you are just going through a temporary rough spell then no, but if you don't plan on ever getting a decent job then yes you should. 5 years? No, you should only be allowed to have 1 kid while on welfare and it has to be within the 1st year. After 2 years, mandatory abortion and then after 3 years sterilization. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Brian Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 hell naw I love payin for dem little ronis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rustlestiltskin Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 I'm for it. Sterilize the fuck outta Them!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paktinat Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 Should corporations who receive subsidies be forced to undergo mandatory sterilization? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Alex- Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 No, but drug tests should be mandatory. x2 I don't agree with recipients popping out one kid after another, and I know a lot of them could care less about the kids they have, but after becoming a father this year I could never have it in my heart to deny somebody else that joy. This is The Kitchen, and that may have sounded gay as fuck, but it's how I really feel. Nothing at all that I've ever experienced in my life can compare to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unfunnyryan Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 No. This is America. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cordell Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 Shit I say pay them for passed drug tests and anyone who gets sterilized should get paid until their 50 years old. Pay them less for each kid they already have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjrsplat Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 5 years? No, you should only be allowed to have 1 kid while on welfare and it has to be within the 1st year. After 2 years, mandatory abortion and then after 3 years sterilization. So you're advocating population control through mandatory abortion? That's probably the best solution. "We could just cut off your assistance and force you to work and pay your own bills, but instead we're just going to kill your unborn children for the next year and then sterilize you." :dumb: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 I think you should have to apply to have a kid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nurkvinny Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 No, but drug tests should be mandatory. Yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wnaplay1647545503 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 Yep +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRocket1647545505 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 No, but I feel we should do as China does, in that, you can have 1-2 kids, but after that, the assistance starts to fall off. I also feel that the US should implement a 2 kid limit on everyone anyways. Shit's getting crowded around here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Not Brian Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 should people who post on cr first take an IQ test? I vote no because a forum with seven people wouldn't be much fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duff1647545513 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 The drug test thing sounds good, but the way the would do/are doing it will just end up costing tax payers more. They get a notice in plenty of time to pass the test themselves and if they don't stop using long enough to pass the test, alternative clean piss is easy to come by. Tax payers will be the ones paying for the test. If the test is failed, all the welfare recipient would have to say is they have a drug problem, from there, we as tax payers, would fund their trip to rehab and the drug test after. Then just continue paying for their welfare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spankis Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 WHAT ABOUT THE CATHOLICS AND THEIR CATHOLICISM???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
10phone2 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 no, but any food, unemployment, welfare assistance should stop after 6 months regardless of the situation. People have to be motivated to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boosted98gst Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 My neighbor is ballin.......she has 4 kids single mom (29) , living in an apt thats overlooking the ocean (2,000) , goes to sdsu fulltime, only works part time on base, drives a bmw suv. Invites all the neighbors over every ppv fight, bbq, beer, herbs. She works on fucking base at the 7day store......you can even look online its 10 bucks an hour.........How is this shit even possible?! They need to give this bitch some Yaz before the state gets her a lambo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC66Bronco Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 shit with out welfare how else would I pay for my beer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC66Bronco Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 My neighbor is ballin.......she has 4 kids single mom (29) , living in an apt thats overlooking the ocean (2,000) , goes to sdsu fulltime, only works part time on base, drives a bmw suv. Invites all the neighbors over every ppv fight, bbq, beer, herbs. She works on fucking base at the 7day store......you can even look online its 10 bucks an hour.........How is this shit even possible?! They need to give this bitch some Yaz before the state gets her a lambo. Hooker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Karacho1647545492 Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 No, but drug tests should be mandatory. In Florida this was shown to be extremely costly to taxpayers. Fewer than 3% of welfare recipients ended up being denied welfare due to failed drug tests, and the state had to reimburse those who passed the tests. It ended up costing the state significantly more to reimburse people than they saved by denying benefits to drug users. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=0 I understand the concept and the purpose of denying benefits to drug users, but this is obviously not a cost-effective way of doing it. As for sterilization, everyone should be sterilized in a reversible fashion at birth or in youth. When you reach 18, you must pass a test. That test would include things like: -drug screen -how to develop and stick to a budget -understanding credit cards and debt -how to care for a child -are you employed/employable? -mental fitness test if you're able to meet a certain baseline, congrats! you can reproduce. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC66Bronco Posted September 18, 2012 Report Share Posted September 18, 2012 In Florida this was shown to be extremely costly to taxpayers. Fewer than 3% of welfare recipients ended up being denied welfare due to failed drug tests, and the state had to reimburse those who passed the tests. It ended up costing the state significantly more to reimburse people than they saved by denying benefits to drug users. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/us/no-savings-found-in-florida-welfare-drug-tests.html?_r=0 I understand the concept and the purpose of denying benefits to drug users, but this is obviously not a cost-effective way of doing it. Easy fix don't reimburse them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.