conn-e-rot Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 http://www.ammoland.com/2012/06/12/wisconsins-first-ccw-self-defense-case/#ixzz1xc6auRZU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedytriple Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Wow he is lucky he is not being brought up on charges for breaking a the law?!! Wonder what would happen in ohio if you went into a cpz and did the same thing? Good for him though for protecting himself and others. After rereading the article he needs to train more? 6-7 shots and it says BOTH suspects were arrested? One should have been in a big black bag with that many shots fired? Edited June 13, 2012 by speedytriple Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiggy74 Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 So it sounds like he shot at him 6-7 times but the guy still got away. Did he miss or what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedytriple Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 I had to re read that also. 6-7 shots dude should be dead after the first few. If not he needs to realize he is held accountable for everyone of those missed shots if they were to hit a by stander. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conn-e-rot Posted June 13, 2012 Author Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 maybe he was blind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedytriple Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 Must have been he said he did not see the no gun sign as well LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDBGoalie Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) Old story BTW, http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/aldi-customer-wont-be-charged-in-shooting-sk42et0-138688529.htmlHe fired 6-7 rounds, and hit the suspect in the leg and the forehead. The suspect then dropped his shotgun and fled. After a shot in the forehead....The shotgun was also unloaded. Dumbass criminals....I applaud the guy for drawing and firing only when he had a clear shot. It seems he also waited until he had no other choice and only fired when faced with potential lethal danger (Suspect aiming at him).However, I think for the state to not charge him is a bad thing. Although the fact he was carrying did foil the robbery, he was breaking the law by doing so. Now the state of Wisconsin is telling every CCW permit holder that they can ignore all the signs and prohibited places as long as they act accordingly. Sounds like a bad idea to me.And for the love of god, Target Practice.... Edited June 13, 2012 by BDBGoalie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedytriple Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 What I was saying about him breaking the law, by ignoring the sign. He is lucky. How does someone run away from a forehead shot? Bathsalts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scruit Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 What I was saying about him breaking the law, by ignoring the sign. He is lucky. How does someone run away from a forehead shot? Bathsalts?Dunno. Glancing blow? Bullet his at a very low angle and skipped rather than penetrating? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScubaCinci Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 Dunno. Glancing blow? Bullet his at a very low angle and skipped rather than penetrating?It can happen...can't access the link from work - what caliber? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reimbrandt Posted June 13, 2012 Report Share Posted June 13, 2012 Hes a vampire...... Gotta use those UV rounds......... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BDBGoalie Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 I'm not sure. I can't find a good picture of the Aldi's in question. Seems like after the incident they moved the sign to a less visible location. The shooter's quote of "...not suffering any repercussions for practicing my constitutional right", leads me to believe that he didn't care about the sign.Just seems like if the state has a law that allows businesses to prohibit weapons, and then that law is violated and the state not only doesn't press charges, but applauds the shooter, they might as well remove the law about the signs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFM Posted June 16, 2012 Report Share Posted June 16, 2012 Damn foreigners with guns shooting up our grocery stores. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.