Leaderboard

Black Nissan Xterra didn't check her blind spot and tried to change lanes on top of a Red Grand Prix. The Grand Prix swerved and braked to avoid contact, over-corrected for her swerving, went left,right,left and spun into the wall on the wet pavement. The Nissan kept right on driving. I took issue with that. Plate number was recorded, and I called the police right after I got off the highway (next exit). The accident had already been reported, but they were surprised to hear from a witness. The responding officer just left my office. I filled out a witness statement and chatted with him a bit. He said it's going to be difficult to nail the Xterra driver because they have no way of proving that she actually knew she caused an accident. that kind of pisses me off. IMHO, she knew. Her actions immediately after indicated that she knew. She looked damn shaken up, and immediately picked up her phone. I was hoping she was calling the police, but I'm pretty sure my wife would call me first... anyway, the officer thanked me for making the call, and said at the very least, I probably spared the driver of the red Pontiac a ticket for reckless driving. "I'll tell you right now, everyone who wrecks their car 'got cut off.' I wouldn't have believed her if you hadn't backed up her story." If they do go after the Nissan driver, I think she's pretty screwed. I just had a mock trial problem (real facts and police reports; fake names) that involved a traffic accident. I am uniquely in-tune with what information is needed in a witness statement to make it useful and unambiguous. I stuck to the facts in the witness report, but I think the black nissan driver was clearly at fault, even though no contact occurred... The Pontiac driver swerved and braked purely to avoid contact. The notion that she should have sat there and allowed her car to be hit while traveling 60mph to be sure someone else was at fault is ridiculous to me. I think a jury would see it that way too - not that this will go to trial, but I might make some good business contacts if the parties lawyer up! ...plus it never hurts to have a good relationship with local law enforcement.

So many people have him on their ignore lists, it's actually beneficial for most to repost anything interesting he posts.

she peed her pants on stage...just sayin

zombie proof house... http://all-that-is-interesting.com/post/4956385434/the-first-zombie-proof-house

pledge works on leather and that's what I used to use until I tried Lexol. it works way better. noticeably softer and cleaner. it conditions the leathers with the same oils they were made with at the tanner. and it makes them smell brand new. best part is just about any autoparts store sells lexol products. http://www.lexol.com/product_leather_conditioner.aspx

Oh brother,another re-puke claiming to be a christian to get votes.From the new testement that I read all these guys (Bush,Kasich,Ray-gun,etc,etc) line up much closer to the pharisees than they do Jesus.Jesus was always with,and helping the downtrodden,not licking the boots of the rich.As for Ron Paul,time will tell. If you're looking for God or his people in politics,good luck.Politicians weren't on the side of Jesus in the bible,and they aren't now.

Not hatin' just a little penis...errr....car envy:D

His stuff is filled with pro-Christian state type speech. This wasn't the one I was thinking of but the first I ran across of more direct type statements: "The Founding Fathers envisioned a robustly Christian yet religiously tolerant America, with churches serving as vital institutions that would eclipse the state in importance...." He very much believes that the Christian church should play more of a role in government. You want him to come out and literally say he wants a Church run government? That would be political suicide. He's playing people just like every politician does. ...and Yes Thomas Jefferson was just one, although a key one, of the 55 or so 'founding fathers'; very good Ben.

RP had me at hello.

The LSD episode was weird, but there was still some good info in it. This past episode was another good one Now that they seem to be bringing everything to a head though... I'm wondering where they're left to go with the story line in the future?? This has been the main underlying plotline for several seasons now. How do you continue on after saving a parallel universe... Or destroying one? Anything attempting to follow will seem anti-climactic

No Donald fan but don't underestimate the financial genius of The Donald. Bankrupting businesses is a big part of what he does for a living. He buys/builds them as separate companies....leverages them to the wall and then bleeds the money out to his primary holding company by charging it management fees. Then he bankrupts them and buys them back for pennies on the dollar and does it again. He actually bankrupted his casinos twice using this method. This last time another bidder came along and he is going to lose control but he still made millions with his system.

haha all I could think of when I seen it was "Throw some D's on that bitch"

You saw a moron on an SV? That WAS lost! jk, love you bro Saturday was the perfect ride; fast, food, fast I no longer wish to do 300 miles, food, 120 miles

Bump 288

ty ty, its nice that it has finally warmed up. was starting to get that itch with her locked up all winter.

haha i ran out of rep to give out in about 5 posts pizza bagels i doubt, HGH and muscle milk im sure of

Hey, got a yard trimmer I bought on here for $100. I'll sell it to ya for $250. :gabe:

guys, he's only selling these because he cant afford them.. free bump