Leaderboard

English is his second or third language. Since you live in Elyria you obviously fucked up somewhere in your life.

You have Benz and talks like this? Me wonder how.

No, the 1st rule of toddler fight club is you don't talk about toddler fight club. The 2nd rule of toddler fight club is you don't talk about toddler fight club. The 3rd rule of toddler fight club someone yells stop, goes limp, taps out, the fight is over. The 4th rule of toddler fight club only two toddlers to a fight. The 5th rule of toddler fight club one fight at a time. The 6th rule of toddler fight club no shirts, no shoes. The 7th rule of toddler fight club fights will go on as long as they have to. The 8th rule of toddler fight club if this is your first day at daycare toddler fight club, you have to fight. So, the 9th rule of toddler fight club is you don't shoot video of toddler fight club Still sick shit that adults are seriously pulling this crap. I say burn the witches

Since this is a chain email, don't forget to do your own digging instead of taking it word for word. The man booby trapped his house and ended up shooting the 16 yr old in the back with an illegal gun. The rest of the timeline after the "April, 2000" conviction: -April 10, 2000 - At his trial at Norwich Crown Court, Mr Martin denies murdering Mr Barras, attempting to murder Mr Fearon, wounding Mr Fearon with intent to cause injury and possession of an illegal firearm with intent to endanger lives. - April 19, 2000 - Outcry erupts after Mr Martin is found guilty of murdering Mr Barras and sentenced to life. During the trial, it emerged the burglars had 114 convictions between them. -August 20, 2001 - At an appeal heard at London's High Court, Mr Martin's sentence is reduced to manslaughter and his sentence is cut to five years. - January 2003 - Mr Martin's hopes of release are dashed by the Parole Board after he refuses to show remorse. July 28, 2003 - Mr Martin is released from custody. He sells his story to the Daily Mirror for £100,000. Also, the treaty and prejudice against Obama is false.

another chain mail to ponder You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows. One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless.. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter. "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask. "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven." The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them.. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headlinesays it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters.. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national mediapicks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero. Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The mediapublishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars. A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you.. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison. This case really happened. On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term... How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire ? It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.. Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns. Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerfordmass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead. The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objectiveeven though Ryan used a rifle.) Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school. For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the presshad a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the mediagave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens. During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released. Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands." All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars. When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens. How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kind of like cars. Sound familiar? WAKE UP AMERICA ; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION. "...It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." --Samuel Adams If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know. You had better wake up, because Obama is doing this very same thing, over here, if he can get it done The UN Small Arms Treaty that Hilary is negotiating would take away our 2nd Amendment rights. And there are stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along with him. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Just remember - the reason the Japanese didn't invade the USA is because they knew that Most of the citizens were armed

^ wait, did that just happen? You thought it was a waste of time, then you spent even more of your time making (several) posters about what a waste of time it was? I grow more confused about people every day.

I just don't get why the hell those ladies are just walking around with their hands over their ears. HIT THE DECK BITCHES!

For a fee a local surgeon can respring those for the proper sag and swap some silicone in those to get them ready to hit the track again. Until then it appears unsafe to ride in a high performance application but it may be safe for street walking only. Sent from my SCH-I510 using Tapatalk 2

Looks like I'm taking a trip to the airport...... As I approach the metal detector, No ticket....(check) No photo ID....(check) Swallowed a few coins....(check) "come with me sir...."

http://i.imgur.com/zod1W.jpg

I think anytime children are physically/mentally beaten, molested, mistreated, etc. that federal law should mandate the offender(s) be immediately treated in the same manner, without bearing any weight on their sentence. Also, opportunity should be given to the victims to choose to participate in the return punishment. Might help the victims gain a bit of closure by getting retribution This country should hold public canings and dismemberments for ANYONE commiting crimes against our youth

Self defense in the UK is based upon the concept of "reasonable force", and there is no more legalistic definition than that. it is entirely up to the jury to decide if it was reasonable. Related to the Caldwell Test concept of "Would a normal person sharing the same characteristics, and having the same information as the defendant, have acted in this way?" Problem is that the in UK the people (and therefore the jury) are far less likely to consider any "active" defense as reasonable, especially if you had the chance to avoid. Even if that means fleeing your house. Life is valued above property to such an extend that you have to PROVE you life was in danger and that the burglary was not just a property crime. Hot burglaries are common (because of this!) and are almost exclusively property crimes, and it is liekly to be considered unreasonable to force a physical confrontation to expel a burglar who was only committing a property crime. Add a weapon into the mix and now you look like you went looking for a fight. Add an illegal gun and you look like you went looking to shoot someone. Imagine you hit a shoplifter with a baseball bat for stealing a candy bar... You physically hurt someone over a $1 candy bar. Just let them take the bar and call the police. That's how they view it in the UK. Hot burglaries are much less common in the US - take-over home invasions are more common. Thus, in the US, anyone enters your home is orders of magnitude more likely to be there to do you physical harm.

Okay you can shoot me with a pussy. Just make sure it's not too sloppy.

Obama isn't black, he's beige.

I wouldn't get that chain but I would the sprocket. JT is well known for sprockets. steel so it will last you a long while. Stick to the brand names for the chain. EK is typically the less expensive and well known. but RK, DID, Regina, renthal and Tsubaki are some of the top of the line chains. don't forget a front sprocket. JT makes those too.

Your wheel is an ugly shade of green?

Can't believe I missed this thread the first time around. I've been getting into photography for the last several years and have really enjoyed it. Motorcycle: Non-moto related: If anyone's ever interested in heading up to the Valley (or wherever) to shoot, just let me know - always glad to have company.

I agree Major thread fail on all kinds of level. Sounds like the OP has his mind made up about this. Its true that you cant change stupid.

insert any scenerio you want, a cop on the streets is a cop on the streets no different if he's running radar, serving a warrant responding to another call or collecting from a deadbeat. Thier on the clock and available for a Mary Joe's call just the same. the response times will always vary, and if anything it's easier to walk away from collecting a fine than it is writing up a shoplifter. end of day if you want to blame responese time or costs on anyone, blame the deadbeat. . a good upstanding citizen who decided NOT to pay their bill. in the middle of a move? give me a fucking break, they aren't knocking on the door of someone served 30 days ago. besides, if you don't pay your bill and a cop shows up at work, that's YOUR fault so oh well if you're embarrassed. They serve warrants which is the same thing...they track you down, have authority to do so and will go to the ends of the earth to get your signature. The only difference here is it's on a check not a copy of an arrest warrant. It's exactly in line with what they do. Dude, I thought I typed a lot. ^^ again, inject whatever you want, if the broke dick bastards out there don't like it pay up and shut up. They aren't spending hours "tracking people down" they are going off a list of work and home for deadbeats and in the mean time 100% capable and able to take emergency calls. No need to involve a 3rd party collection agency and IMO it's much safer and more efficient.

U mad?