Tpoppa

I considered that very thing, but the numbers didn't seem to justify it. I would have invested more $$ if the market would have dropped.

PM me some details. Trailering might be the way to go after a few surgeries last year,.

ok

I'm hoping WB is right. http://money.cnn.com/2017/02/27/investing/warren-buffett-bubble-stocks-trump-rally/

My 401k is great again.

Who watched the Congressional Address? I had prior commitments and was not near a TV. CNN actually reported some positive feedback, which is kind of a surprise.

So I went into the locker room during classes Went into your locker and I smashed your glasses

Right, I'm sure Ohio eCheck was instrumental in cracking that case

Based on the zero research I am willing to do on this subject... I would imagine the eCheck program will remain in place as long as there is some threat of Feds withholding highway funds for failure to comply. Nevermind that cars today run so much cleaner than they did when the program began in the 90's (?). Any actual benefit from the program would be miniscule.

Agreed. If it was in either of their interest to cooperate to better the lives of the American people, that shit would have happened 100 years ago.

I like London broil just fine.

A broil?

Moar fear!

Some EPA regs are misguided. Not only do they result is lost jobs, but actually cause increased environmental impact.

I've been looking into these. It's like a mountain bike with a motor, and it's street legal. MSRP is around $2300 http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/motorcycles/2016/2016-ClevelandCycleWerks-Hooligan-FXR.htm

No thanks. I've had plenty of wife sex. I prefer girlfriend sex and stranger sex.

This is true. EPA grants do not fund unbiased research. For example, If the goal of your research is to prove global warming there is a chance you can get an EPA grant. OTOH, if the goal of your research is to conduct unbiased research or to disprove global warming the EPA has no use for you. https://www.epa.gov/research-grants/climate-change-research-grants

Common sense EPA is fine. Over reaching EPA is not, which has been the case for a long time.

One of the primary uses of the EPA has been to make Washington insiders rich. And they don't care that the EPA was beyond they charter. Scenario: Suddenly many politicians and insiders invest in a "Green Energy" company that you and I have never heard of. Even if we had heard of it, these investments are not available to the general public. Soon after, the EPA "coincidentally," passes regulation and/or press release which causes this unknown company's stock to soar. Sometimes these companies are even propped up by federal funding. Then these "savvy" Washington investors seem to know when to divest just before these, once stable, companies go right out of business. It happens over and over. You and I would go to jail for this, that's why Congress voted themselves exempt from insider trading laws. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/10/22/so-just-how-rich-is-congress-richer-than-you/?utm_term=.9c96e92a9109

I am all for clean air and water, but the EPA has been running amuck, well beyond thier charter for far too long. They need checks and balances like every other department.

I personally wouldn't own a pre-2017 FZ 09. The have some shortcomings. There are reasons they're being sold cheap. I would however own the nicely updated 2017 model.

Things change. Now, I make my own own beef jerky.

We just always plan longish routes. Stopping to eat means getting home later. I rode with Gasser for 10+ years before I found out he was a vegetarian. True story.