Jump to content

chevysoldier

Supporting Member
  • Posts

    15,487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Posts posted by chevysoldier

  1. okay here is the deal , the kid who owns the bike, told me that it didn't lay down, " it did on both sides " his father said that they bought from a friend, and he was gonna call and ask him, but i asked him not to before i leave, both break leveler and gear has lay down marks, the break leveler has " hammer beating marks too " they said they never knew that.

    the headlight surronding plastic is all mess, the mirrors are out of place " not that bad but the right mirror base is actually out of place, some cracks in front plastic, the guys looks nice, couldn't test the wheel bearing as it's freezing to ride, and no center stand, and it was too heavy to push it over the side kick and check the wheels, rust in the gas tank, 2 differnt keys, i know i want a bike, but this looks like too much for me , it's a 1996 katana 600 with 18799 miles on it for 1700$, i think i should pass right ?

    Thanks

    yes, pass. Sounds like a HUGE can of worms.

  2. i dont know which one to take the BRC or BRC2?

    i have my endorsement but ive only put 500miles on 2 different bikes in the past 2 years :( 5000miles in the past 3yrs, 4 diff bikes :(

    the BRC doesnt specifically say with course completion you get the endorsement waiver...

    the BRC2 DOES specifically say that with course completion you GET the endorsement waiver...

    someone shed some light on this for me...i want my endorsement!!!!

    Jporter, his wife and I took the BRC last year. They both got their waiver then got the endorsement. I was already endorsed going into the class, wanted the insurance drop.

  3. SHORT NOTICE

    Confirmed Mission

    James "Jim"

    Rosenthal, 86

    Toledo, Ohio

    USN WWII / Korean War Veteran

    Visitation/Services:

    Michael W. Pawlak Funeral Home

    1640 Smith Road (at Jackman)

    Temperance, MI 48182

    Visitation-01 February 2010@ 1000hrs-1300hrs-(10AM-1PM)

    Services-01 February 2010@1300hrs-(1PM)

    Staging:

    Michael W. Pawlak Funeral Home

    01 February 2010@0900hrs-(9AM)

    Interment:

    Calvary Cemetery

    2224 Dora Street

    Toledo, OH 43607

    Mr. Rosenthal was attached to the 7th Fleet Radio Unit as a Japanese Intercept Operator. During the Korean War he served as a Chinese and Russian Intercept Operator. He was a member of the Naval Cryptologic Veterans Association. Mr. Rosenthal is also the Uncle of Patriot Guard Colorado Asst. State Captain, Mike Rosenthal, Mike please except our sincere condolences on your loss. Your family is in our thoughts and prayers.

    District # 1 Ride Captain Frank Harris is assigned this mission of Honor and respect., please follow his instructions and dress per the weather conditions. Remember your 3'x5' American Flags. In the event of inclement weather please use your own judgment on how you get safely to the mission.

    Bob Woods

    Ohio State Captain

    Patriot Guard Riders

  4. Short Notice

    Confirmed Mission

    SrA Donald Xavier Anthe, 23

    Amelia, Ohio

    Duty Station: Cheyenne, Wyoming

    Visitation:

    E C Nurre Funeral Home

    Amelia Chapel

    177 West Main Street

    Amelia, Ohio 45103

    31 January 2010@1800-2000hrs-(6-8PM)

    Staging:

    EC Nurre Funeral Home

    Amelia Chapel

    31 January 2010@1700hrs-(5PM)

    Services:

    E C Nurre Funeral Home

    01 February 2010@1000hrs-(10AM)

    Staging:

    E C Nurre Funeral Home

    01 February 2010@0900hrs-(9AM)

    Our mission is complete after the Services

    District # 7 Ride Captain Mike Hamilton is assigned this mission of Honor and Respect, please follow his instructions. Remember your 3'x5' American Flags and dress per the weather conditions. In the event of inclement weather please use your own judgment on how you get safely to the mission.

    Bob Woods

    Ohio State Captain

    Patriot Guard Riders

  5. ME:

    they are not being forced to have a plan that they may not want, because the government health care is pre approved.

    You: and so is everyone in america who has health insurance!!!

    Have you been drinking? Am I carrying on a conversation with a drug addict?

    You present your 'facts', they get shot down or you totally refuse to acknowledge you were wrong, and then you just switch to something else like nothing happened.

    Have fun with that.

    if I don't have healthcare (not approved), and I don't want it, I will be forced to get it.

    I didn't switch anything.

  6. You replying slow... just an example of an opinion. And judging by your response, it struck a small chord - enough for you to mention it. Which once again shows how easy it is to invoke a response. I might think you reply slow, Inya might think you type faster than Flash Gordon... Just like whoever authored that information/opinion YOU posted.

    Keep coming up with opinions and not facts. ;)

  7. I just read "Section 3116". It's 'definitions'. What it's saying is a "qualified individual" is someone who is not on Medicare, and NOT covered under a Federal program...or for that matter, ANY Employer sponsored coverage.

    I don't see anything about any exemption. Maybe it's somewhere I'm not looking. There doesn't seem to be anything on the web with ACTUAL QUOTES from the bill..so I'm hoping someone will enlighten me.

    Here's the bill

    http://help.senate.gov/BAI09A84_xml.pdf

  8. Like was already explained in my LAST post, they selectively choose the text that exempts federal employees, but don't explain that it also exempts the general populace as long as they currently have insurance and are happy with it.

    Do you get it now?

    Wrong, doesn't matter if your happy with it or not, has to be an approved plan.

  9. Let us dissect your information:

    Pure opinion. I think you're replying too slow... "barnstorming the nation" the connotation of the word 'barnstorming' used to invoke a fear response. And then "swift approval of legislation that is taking shape." So.... swift isn't defined, and I don't understand how anyone can approve anything that is still taking shape.

    Stingy, like barnstorming, used to invoke fear. And, stingy in who's opinion? Maybe I think your current plan is stingy... Then, 'HMO-style controls'... you mean like the ones in the CURRENT system? So, the people that are anti-reform are comparing this legislation to what they're currently in favor of in order to make people fearful - that's so circular it hurts my head.

    Like was already explained in my LAST post, they selectively choose the text that exempts federal employees, but don't explain that it also exempts the general populace as long as they currently have insurance and are happy with it.

    Thusly, putting in how it is written above - I'll call it propaganda via omission - it strikes that nerve with the anti-government folks that say, "Well, if Congress is exempt, then shucks, if it's not good enough for them, then they're trying to screw over the regular people, don'tcha know?" And without even reading the legislation or figuring out the logic behind this perceived outrage... people blindly repeat that and are anti-reform without understanding exactly how they've been duped into buying into the GOP agenda.

    Do you get it now?

    Umm, I'm replying slow? I showed you quotes from the bill while you were dissecting my post. What if I don't want a healthcare plan? I'm penalized for that? Only hit on all the fear invoking propaganda. Don't touch the text from the bill.

  10. http://www.congress.org/congressorg/bio/userletter/?letter_id=4234377546

    Representative Virginia Foxx (R-NC 5th)

    3rd-term Republican from North Carolina.

    · More Letters to

    Rep. Foxx

    · Search All

    Letters

    Letters To Leaders

    All messages are published with permission of the sender. The general topic of this message is Gov't Operations:

    Subject:

    Amendment 28

    To:

    President Barack Obama

    Sen. Richard Burr

    Sen. Kay Hagan

    Rep. Virginia Foxx

    November 10, 2009

    Amendment 28

    Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United

    States that does not apply equally to the Senators or Representatives,

    and Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators or

    Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the

    United States.

    Purlear , NC

    From a Republican asking for equality between Sens/Reps and the people to a democrat. And I showed you the dems bill earlier.

  11. What are you talking about?

    http://www2.insidenova.com/isn/news/opinion/columns/article/mercer_column_same_health_care_as_congress/44072/

    Care to try again, with another 'left' hypocrisy? It's hypocrisy for adding in a feature to the health care reform that the GOP wanted? To be able to maintain your current plan if you want? Try again...

    The president is barnstorming the nation, urging swift approval of legislation that is taking shape in Congress. This legislation — the Affordable Health Choices Act that’s being drafted by Sen. Edward Kennedy’s staff and the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee — will push Americans into stingy insurance plans with tight, HMO-style controls. It specifically exempts members of Congress (along with federal employees; the exemptions are in section 3116)

    http://www.patientpowernow.org/2009/06/22/congress-federal-employees-exempt-insurance-mandates/

  12. The right is stereotypically a party of Bible-thumpers, so now they don't even support the Bible? Eye for an eye afterall...

    I know two wrongs don't make a right, but there's only so much you can do taking the 'high road' all the time, so it might be time to fight in the gutter with the same tactics as the GOP. Demonstrate the huge hypocrisies in that party.

    You are correct with the hypocrisies, but they are in both parties, more so in the left. The high road all the time? HAHA please. Go back to watching your CNN so they can feed you more liberal lies.

×
×
  • Create New...